From: "Jakub Narębski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] push: introduce implicit push
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 10:33:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <516A69E3.2090805@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vehed7ilu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
W dniu 14.04.2013 06:42, Junio C Hamano pisze:
> I personally think it is much more sellable to use an even simpler
> rule than what Jeff suggested, to make
>
> git push -- <refspec>
>
> go to the remote.pushdefault (falling back to remote.default that is
> "origin"), without even paying attention to what branch you are on,
> and ignoring branch.*.remote/pushremote configuration.
>
> That is sufficient to support the triangular, the publish-to-mine,
> and the centralized workflows, no? In any of these cases, the
> repository you push out to is _one_, even though it may be a
> different one from where you pull from. If you have a very special
> branch that goes to a different place than all the other branches,
> you can always push out while on that branch without any refspec,
> anyway.
I think it also supports users of 'matching' that have push default
correctly configured. Currently they can use "git push" in all cases
but first push of a branch, where they had to use "git push origin
branch", or "git push pushremote branch", and with those changes can
now simply use "git push -- branch".
Nice.
Here I think simpler is better, especially that diferent users
have different expectations: push to remote based on current branch or
push to remote or remotes based on branch or branches being pushed.
--
Jakub Narębski
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-14 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-12 15:33 [RFC/PATCH] push: introduce implicit push Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-12 22:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-13 4:49 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-14 4:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-14 8:33 ` Jakub Narębski [this message]
2013-04-14 13:29 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-15 3:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-15 7:07 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-04-15 7:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-15 8:35 ` John Keeping
2013-04-15 9:17 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-15 9:46 ` John Keeping
2013-04-15 9:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-15 9:44 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-15 9:59 ` John Keeping
2013-04-15 16:39 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-15 17:13 ` John Keeping
2013-04-15 17:18 ` Felipe Contreras
2013-04-15 9:35 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-16 2:05 ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-04-16 2:13 ` Jonathan Nieder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=516A69E3.2090805@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).