From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] push: introduce implicit push Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:07:30 +0200 Message-ID: <516BA732.4080405@viscovery.net> References: <1365780835-2853-1-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> <7v38uvcrjl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vehed7ilu.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vppxw335o.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra , Git List , Jeff King , Jonathan Nieder To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 15 09:10:46 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1URdYr-0004Bc-Ao for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:10:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964894Ab3DOHKk (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:10:40 -0400 Received: from so.liwest.at ([212.33.55.14]:3313 "EHLO so.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964881Ab3DOHKk (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Apr 2013 03:10:40 -0400 Received: from [81.10.228.254] (helo=theia.linz.viscovery) by so.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1URdW2-0007UR-Hs; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:08:20 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.95] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.95]) by theia.linz.viscovery (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046401660F; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 09:07:30 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 In-Reply-To: <7vppxw335o.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 4/15/2013 5:04, schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Ramkumar Ramachandra writes: > >> ... In my proposal, the >> precedence order branch..pushremote, remote.pushdefault, >> branch..remote, remote.default, origin, remains the same: we >> just want to change which branch that refers to. > > That "changing the meaning of " in the middle, and doing so > will be confusing to the users, is exactly the issue, isn't it? > >> In my >> opinion, it is a much more subtle change than the entirely new >> precedence order that you're inventing. > > Adding "--" has never been my itch. I just brought it up out of thin > air as a possible alternative that is less confusing. User says: git push -- master docs release Then git pushes the three branches to three different upstreams. You find that confusing. Do I understanding correctly so far? If I were a push.default=(simple|upstream) type, then I would be totally aware that there are three different upstreams involved because I had had to configure them manually and explicitly (correct?), and I would be completely surprised if the push would *not* go to three different upstreams. Just my 2 cents. (But I'm a traditional "matching" type, so take this with a grain of salt. Or I may be missing the point of this thread, as I haven't followed closely.) -- Hannes