git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Erik Faye-Lund <kusmabite@gmail.com>,
	Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>,
	Robert Zeh <robert.allan.zeh@gmail.com>,
	Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>,
	Antoine Pelisse <apelisse@gmail.com>,
	Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14] Improve git-status --ignored
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 22:06:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <516C5DBF.1010102@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vwqs3r3m4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>

Am 15.04.2013 21:33, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> 
>> Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> This patch series addresses several bugs and performance issues in
>>> .gitignore processing.
>>
>> A 8-patch series ending at 5d765dc7888b (dir.c: git-status: avoid
>> is_excluded checks for tracked files, 2013-03-18) has been cooking
>> in 'next'; in general we won't revert and requeue a new round for a
>> topic that has already merged to 'next'.
>>

I'm sorry to have caused such trouble. I thought you were expecting a reroll from this:

Am 19.03.2013 15:48, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Would we we better off kicking nd/read-directory-recursive-optim
> back to 'pu' (and eventually ejecting it) and replacing it with a
> reroll of Karsten's series when it comes, perhaps?


>> Is this "v2" an update for that topic?
> 
> Hmph, it seems to be the case.  I was hoping that the one in 'next'
> was basically in a good shape, not so broken to require a wholesale
> replacement like this.  Overall, this round of reroll seems to be
> better structured.
> 
> Let's revert the v1 from 'next', queue this one to 'pu', and make it
> advance slooowly this time.
> 

Thanks. I don't plan any more rerolls unless required by upcoming discussion.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-15 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-18 20:28 [PATCH 0/8] Improve git-status --ignored Karsten Blees
2013-03-19  4:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-19  5:20   ` Duy Nguyen
2013-03-19 10:48     ` Karsten Blees
2013-03-19 14:48     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-03-19 15:58       ` Duy Nguyen
2013-04-15 19:04 ` [PATCH v2 00/14] " Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 19:05   ` [PATCH v2 01/14] dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't drop ignored directories Karsten Blees
2013-04-16 17:33     ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-17  0:31       ` Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 19:06   ` [PATCH v2 02/14] dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't list files in " Karsten Blees
2013-04-16  9:57     ` [PATCH] read_revisions_from_stdin: make copies for handle_revision_arg Thomas Rast
2013-04-16 18:17       ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-15 19:07   ` [PATCH v2 03/14] dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't list empty ignored directories Karsten Blees
2013-04-16 17:48     ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-04-17  0:31       ` Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 19:08   ` [PATCH v2 04/14] dir.c: git-ls-files --directories: don't hide empty directories Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 19:08   ` [PATCH v2 05/14] dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't list empty directories as ignored Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 19:09   ` [PATCH v2 06/14] dir.c: make 'git-status --ignored' work within leading directories Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 19:10   ` [PATCH v2 07/14] dir.c: git-clean -d -X: don't delete tracked directories Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 19:11   ` [PATCH v2 08/14] dir.c: factor out parts of last_exclude_matching for later reuse Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 19:11   ` [PATCH v2 09/14] dir.c: move prep_exclude Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 19:12   ` [PATCH v2 10/14] dir.c: unify is_excluded and is_path_excluded APIs Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 21:35     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-15 19:12   ` [PATCH v2 11/14] dir.c: replace is_path_excluded with now equivalent is_excluded API Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 19:13   ` [PATCH v2 12/14] dir.c: git-status: avoid is_excluded checks for tracked files Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 19:14   ` [PATCH v2 13/14] dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't scan the work tree three times Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 19:15   ` [PATCH v2 14/14] dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't scan the work tree twice Karsten Blees
2013-04-15 19:23   ` [PATCH v2 00/14] Improve git-status --ignored Junio C Hamano
2013-04-15 19:33     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-15 20:06       ` Karsten Blees [this message]
2013-04-15 20:25         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-17 19:50           ` Karsten Blees
2013-04-17 22:03             ` Junio C Hamano
2013-04-17 19:50           ` [PATCH v2-pu 11/14] dir.c: replace is_path_excluded with now equivalent is_excluded API Karsten Blees
2013-04-17 19:51           ` [PATCH v2-pu 14/14] dir.c: git-status --ignored: don't scan the work tree twice Karsten Blees

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=516C5DBF.1010102@gmail.com \
    --to=karsten.blees@gmail.com \
    --cc=apelisse@gmail.com \
    --cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@adamspiers.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=kusmabite@gmail.com \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=robert.allan.zeh@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).