From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Branchaud Subject: "lets" vs. "let's" (was: Re: [PATCH v3] Add new @ shortcut for HEAD) Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 10:23:56 -0400 Message-ID: <5181257C.2050108@xiplink.com> References: <1367401888-21055-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Reply-To: marcnarc@xiplink.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eric Sunshine , Felipe Contreras , Git List , Junio C Hamano , Ramkumar Ramachandra , Jeff King , Duy Nguyen To: Thomas Adam X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 01 16:24:30 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UXXxM-0007ZS-C3 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 01 May 2013 16:24:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755652Ab3EAOYY (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 May 2013 10:24:24 -0400 Received: from smtp182.dfw.emailsrvr.com ([67.192.241.182]:51646 "EHLO smtp182.dfw.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751525Ab3EAOYX (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 May 2013 10:24:23 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp18.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 09588268D1D for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 10:24:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: from smtp130.ord.emailsrvr.com (smtp130.ord.emailsrvr.com [173.203.6.130]) by smtp18.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTPS id E1C1A268CFE for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 10:24:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp17.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 492DE3801EF; Wed, 1 May 2013 10:23:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp17.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: mbranchaud-AT-xiplink.com) with ESMTPSA id B12453801C9; Wed, 1 May 2013 10:23:50 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130404 Thunderbird/17.0.5 In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 13-05-01 06:31 AM, Thomas Adam wrote: > On 1 May 2013 11:12, Eric Sunshine wrote: >> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Felipe Contreras >> wrote: >>> So HEAD@{0}~0^0 is too much to type, but we can remove '^0', and we can >>> remove '~0', and we can remove 'HEAD', which leaves us with @{0}, but we >>> can't remove '{0}'? >>> >>> This patch allows '@' to be the same as 'HEAD'. >>> >>> So now we can use 'git show @~1', and all that goody goodness. >>> >>> Until now '@' was a valid name, but it conflicts with this idea, so lets >> >> s/lets/let's/ (contraction of "let us") > > Ah, the contraction versus the first person singular. In this case > where the context is concluding in decision, rather than making a > statement ("Let's go to the shops", for example) then "lets" is the > correct word to use here. You've lost me. I think Eric is right. If "lets" is a verb in this sentence, what is its subject? Besides, of which verb & tense is "lets" the first person singular? Never have I "lets" anything in my life... :) M.