git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lookup_object: prioritize recently found objects
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 07:59:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5183522D.5060405@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130502154618.GA18462@sigill.intra.peff.net>

Am 5/2/2013 17:46, schrieb Jeff King:
> On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 09:05:01AM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>> BTW, do you notice that the function is now modifying an object (the hash
>> table) even though this is rather unexpected from a "lookup" function?
> 
> I think this is fine. The function is conceptually constant from the
> outside; callers don't even know about the hash table. They just know
> that there is some mapping. It's similar to the way that lookup_commit
> will lazily allocate the "struct commit". The callers do not care
> whether it exists already or not; they care that at the end of the
> function, they have a pointer to the commit. Everything else is an
> implementation detail.

Can we be sure that the function is never invoked in concurrently from
different threads? I attempted to audit code paths, but quickly gave up
because I know too little about this machinery.

-- Hannes

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-03  5:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-01 20:34 [PATCH] lookup_object: prioritize recently found objects Jeff King
2013-05-01 21:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-05-02  6:44 ` Johannes Sixt
2013-05-02  6:46   ` Jeff King
2013-05-02  7:05     ` Johannes Sixt
2013-05-02 15:46       ` Junio C Hamano
2013-05-02 15:50         ` Jeff King
2013-05-02 15:46       ` Jeff King
2013-05-03  5:59         ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2013-05-03  6:02           ` Jeff King
2013-05-03  6:16             ` Jeff King
2013-05-02 15:38     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5183522D.5060405@viscovery.net \
    --to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).