From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Torsten_B=F6gershausen?= Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2] path: Fix a sparse warning Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 15:46:08 +0200 Message-ID: <51A606A0.5060101@web.de> References: <51A3B308.6000201@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> <7vhahn2fz2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Ramsay Jones , GIT Mailing-list , tboegi@web.de To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 29 15:46:22 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Uhghp-000369-OF for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 29 May 2013 15:46:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966048Ab3E2NqM (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 09:46:12 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:52554 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935131Ab3E2NqL (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 09:46:11 -0400 Received: from [192.168.209.26] ([195.67.191.23]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MbQbk-1UyFeO1q20-00IwOn; Wed, 29 May 2013 15:46:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 In-Reply-To: <7vhahn2fz2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:YYLjmutON5dCEuJziDUuBLVu6yO6e04zadh0EsfWaL9 lRpxZ4Qgy+fBnvqXL2sxeHKXotCJHYitt50p4JR4mrxurfYCsu GzbhN3wu+ssc2jon5Mj2t8MKmkrQ09vYg6bvi0+rIrxtQZ+n/U osQmOYGWIH2iITbfpL2gnaKrRaeaYec8cVvhrK+wiKTDtnuEvC wDYKkgnD58tqUux3DTwKw== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2013-05-28 19.04, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Can you tell me what the conclusion on the discussion on your two > other patches on 'pu'? > > * rj/mingw-cygwin (2013-05-08) 2 commits > - cygwin: Remove the CYGWIN_V15_WIN32API build variable > - mingw: rename WIN32 cpp macro to GIT_WINDOWS_NATIVE > > I stopped keeping track of the discussion and my vague recollection > was that it is OK for 1.5 but not verified on 1.7 or something? > The tests I did under cygwin 1.7 did not show any regression. /Torsten