From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: A Large Angry SCM Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/CommunityGuidelines Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:09:04 -0400 Message-ID: <51B64070.2080209@gmail.com> References: <51B5D9A1.1080900@ensimag.fr> <7vzjuxj21b.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20130610190102.GF12924@google.com> <51B639FC.7030007@gmail.com> Reply-To: gitzilla@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Junio C Hamano , "Robin H. Johnson" , Git Mailing List To: Ramkumar Ramachandra X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 10 23:09:15 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Um9Kz-0000C7-9M for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 23:09:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753138Ab3FJVJI (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:09:08 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f170.google.com ([209.85.216.170]:52093 "EHLO mail-qc0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752419Ab3FJVJH (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 17:09:07 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id s1so1211016qcw.15 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:09:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:disposition-notification-to:date:from:reply-to :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=P5lG+VXOQ/pIVRAguUN0XOCWAFRIXe3yV1JaNGyy35I=; b=LMWjcOVO6XpQ6ME+IBsBOf+/cTz5Us4y/8dVtEXmR3eJiQ4wyX/906wb61fgUEB5sy IkYVps4fsT/8gxMLRc3YAnzVay2FnmqYToDxTpttXxzqF/F4ZRvOO5P/sTWPApAr+Vtx +JUcmkLQ2BpwIJLP4+sJMOw2a05E9Rn8m0qSqciT/BNM9OYqz5Cm0vgw2pLfxJvtK6sm 7rHgpjleOyFcrPGdxObZTtOEQRHemQy85p13DojqFqFgOECx7AbG9fWY5xtZjLjU595Y B9qY5gylsKoa9JGc69/azAjJNC1jfTSPeGHo7+dOu3LNG5eOBn+akX5ktO5nsKWQrsMr 589w== X-Received: by 10.224.179.148 with SMTP id bq20mr15418225qab.30.1370898546233; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.1.131] (50-88-155-14.res.bhn.net. [50.88.155.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id j9sm15886125qas.3.2013.06.10.14.09.04 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:09:05 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12 In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 06/10/2013 04:56 PM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > A Large Angry SCM wrote: >>> It is absolutely imperative to keep all our contributors productive, >>> and maximize output. >> >> >> Why? >> >> A useful "product" with a maintainable code base are what seems to be more >> important to a successful open source effort. > > Doesn't a successful open source effort (with a good review process, > which we already have) imply a maintainable product with lots of > users? What am I missing, and what change do you propose? > It's not about keeping all of the contributers productive or maximizing output. It's about the result being useful.