From: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Matthieu Moy" <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>,
"Trond Hasle Amundsen" <t.h.amundsen@usit.uio.no>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Marc Branchaud" <mbranchaud@xiplink.com>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Chris Hiestand" <chiestand@salk.edu>,
"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] contrib/hooks/post-receive-email: get description from repo.git/config
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:12:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D2996B.8070503@alum.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v1u7iapzw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
On 07/01/2013 11:58 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>
>> My understanding is that we are waiting on two things:
>>
>> 1. Consensus from the community. I would characterize the feedback on
>> the mailing list as limited in quantity but strongly positive [1-4] and
>> I think that most/all of the wishes for post-receive-email features that
>> were originally omitted from git-multimail have been implemented in the
>> current version. Some of the mailing list feedback was about earlier
>> versions. Do you want people to give feedback specifically about the
>> current version?
>>
>> 2. For me to figure out what part of the git-multimail history I think
>> should be included in the Git project, do any necessary repository
>> rewriting, and submit a pull request to you. The fact that I haven't
>> gotten to this is due to the fact that I've been busy getting git-imerge
>> [5] ready to present at GitMerge.
>
> Ping, now GitMerge is over?
Yes, and its reverberations are slowly getting under control, too :-)
> No need to hurry, but just to make sure this didn't disappear from
> everybody's radar.
I definitely haven't forgotten it. I wasn't so happy with the script's
Python API, and was holding off on the final submission to avoid casting
the old way in stone. But I finally had some time over the last two
weekends to convert to what I think is a more sensible system [1]. (I
also improved the test coverage considerably.)
Feedback would be very welcome, especially from people who have tried
out the old Python API. I am even willing to personally help people
adapt to the new API, as it would help me verify that real-life
customizations are now indeed easier. (Ævar, any news?)
This week I want to convert $WORK to the new version; after that I would
feel comfortable submitting to Git contrib.
(By the way, the changes don't affect how the script can be configured
via "git config" settings, or its backwards compatibility with
post-receive-email. The improvements are all to the Python API.)
I have a logistical question: git-multimail doesn't have its own mailing
list, and GitHub doesn't offer one. I was thinking about setting up a
Google group, but a few people at GitMerge suggested that I instead
direct discussion of git-multimail to the main Git mailing list. I
would slightly prefer that, but I would first like to make sure that the
extra traffic (probably not much) would be welcome on the Git mailing list.
Michael
[1] "master" branch at https://github.com/mhagger/git-multimail
--
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-06 13:53 [PATCH] contrib/hooks/post-receive-email: get description from repo.git/config Trond Hasle Amundsen
2013-05-06 15:22 ` Trond Hasle Amundsen
2013-05-06 15:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-05-06 15:42 ` Matthieu Moy
2013-05-06 16:29 ` Trond Hasle Amundsen
2013-05-07 6:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-05-07 7:46 ` Michael Haggerty
2013-05-07 15:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-05-07 15:36 ` Matthieu Moy
2013-07-01 21:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-07-02 9:12 ` Michael Haggerty [this message]
2013-07-02 18:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-05-07 7:49 ` Matthieu Moy
2013-05-07 14:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2013-05-06 16:26 ` Trond Hasle Amundsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D2996B.8070503@alum.mit.edu \
--to=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=chiestand@salk.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=mbranchaud@xiplink.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=t.h.amundsen@usit.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).