From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lehmann Subject: Re: [PATCH gitk 0/4] gitk support for git log -L Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:07:25 +0200 Message-ID: <51F6CB7D.1070806@web.de> References: <874nblpamj.fsf@linux-k42r.v.cablecom.net> <874nbdnomj.fsf@hexa.v.cablecom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras To: Thomas Rast X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 29 22:07:37 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V3tjF-0002dz-5m for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:07:37 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754212Ab3G2UHd (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:07:33 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:51768 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753144Ab3G2UHc (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jul 2013 16:07:32 -0400 Received: from [192.168.178.41] ([91.3.155.21]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MOAmi-1UyQ5O1VyO-005Viu for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2013 22:07:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 In-Reply-To: <874nbdnomj.fsf@hexa.v.cablecom.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zgS9gdP00my4WJi1CIg1RhYQ+9dfU1ZFkHwD/3gbIKpitHrjg4e 1NKQ1xuSOTUq3KdlfxegIUeQnYbM7JavVidPTKs544tSlEOSIHsVDRFtfroLZ7NQkXgJNYl ECHwP9mzgebgfcKtmDE5zMV2ixiMvxlekHARe1dtHU9RDdt0Em/lotU6ukT8I2maSBd8WdM ym+KHW6GAqSKUX7qOEhrw== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 29.07.2013 21:37, schrieb Thomas Rast: > Thomas Rast writes: > >> Thomas Rast writes: >> >>> Now that git log -L has hit master, I figure it's time to discuss the >>> corresponding change to gitk. >> >> Paul, any news on this? Any chance we can get it into the next release, >> since that will also be the first release to ship with 'git log -L'? > > Jens pointed out privately that the handling of unstuck -L options is > unfortunate, to put it mildly. I'll send a reroll. But as soon as that is fixed I'd really like to see this applied, as I think gitk is the perfect tool to show history information.