From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Gortmaker Subject: Re: Should "git apply --check" imply verbose? Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 14:59:50 -0400 Message-ID: <5213BCA6.9040501@windriver.com> References: <5213873A.6010003@windriver.com> <5213B95D.3040409@windriver.com> <20130820185127.GG4110@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , , Steven Rostedt To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Aug 20 21:02:08 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VBrBv-0004Vu-Id for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 21:02:08 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751273Ab3HTTCC (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:02:02 -0400 Received: from mail.windriver.com ([147.11.1.11]:45363 "EHLO mail.windriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751174Ab3HTTCB (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:02:01 -0400 Received: from ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (ala-hca.corp.ad.wrs.com [147.11.189.40]) by mail.windriver.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r7KIxhWl015649 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [128.224.146.65] (128.224.146.65) by ALA-HCA.corp.ad.wrs.com (147.11.189.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:59:43 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 In-Reply-To: <20130820185127.GG4110@google.com> X-Originating-IP: [128.224.146.65] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 13-08-20 02:51 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >> OK, so given your feedback, how do you feel about a patch to the >> documentation that indicates to use "-v" in combination with the >> "--check" to get equivalent "patch --dry-run" behaviour? > > Sounds like a good idea to me. > > I assume you mean a note in the OPTIONS or EXAMPLES section of > Documentation/git-apply.txt? I hadn't looked exactly where yet, but wherever makes sense and wherever appears in TFM. P. -- > > Thanks, > Jonathan >