git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: John Szakmeister <john@szakmeister.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Zero padded file modes...
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 12:25:29 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5228B079.9000601@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130905153646.GA12372@sigill.intra.peff.net>



On 09/05/2013 11:36 AM, Jeff King wrote:
[...]
>
> I haven't looked carefully at the pack v4 patches yet, but I suspect
> that yes, it's still a problem. The premise of pack v4 is that we can do
> better by not storing the raw git object bytes, but rather storing
> specialized representations of the various components. For example, by
> using an integer to store the mode rather than the ascii representation.
> But that representation does not represent the "oops, I have a 0-padded
> mode" quirk. And we have to be able to recover the original object, byte
> for byte, from the v4 representation (to verify sha1, or to generate a
> loose object or v2 pack).
>
> There are basically two solutions:
>
>    1. Add a single-bit flag for "I am 0-padded in the real data". We
>       could probably even squeeze it into the same integer.
>
>    2. Have a "classic" section of the pack that stores the raw object
>       bytes. For objects which do not match our expectations, store them
>       raw instead of in v4 format. They will not get the benefit of v4
>       optimizations, but if they are the minority of objects, that will
>       only end up with a slight slow-down.
>
> As I said, I have not looked carefully at the v4 patches, so maybe they
> handle this case already. But of the two solutions, I prefer (2). Doing
> (1) can solve _this_ problem, but it complicates the format, and does
> nothing for any future compatibility issues. Whereas (2) is easy to
> implement, since it is basically just pack v2 (and implementations would
> need a pack v2 reader anyway).

3. Keep those objects in v2 packs instead of the v4 pack. Transfers 
would have to be v3 or multi-pack transfers would need to be supported.

4. Don't use v4 packs with projects that have "crufty" objects. Projects 
with such objects may choose to pay the "cost" to "upgrade" to v4 
compatibility.

There's nothing that requires the next pack format to support all of the 
broken stuff that's happened over the years.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-05 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-05 14:00 Zero padded file modes John Szakmeister
2013-09-05 15:36 ` Jeff King
2013-09-05 16:18   ` Duy Nguyen
2013-09-05 16:33     ` Jeff King
2013-09-05 16:56       ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-09-05 16:25   ` A Large Angry SCM [this message]
2013-09-05 17:09   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-09-05 19:10     ` Jeff King
2013-09-05 17:13   ` John Szakmeister
2013-09-05 19:35     ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5228B079.9000601@gmail.com \
    --to=gitzilla@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=john@szakmeister.net \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).