From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lehmann Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Sep 2013, #02; Mon, 9) Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:00:28 +0200 Message-ID: <523EE9EC.9040207@web.de> References: <522F486A.1000705@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Matthieu Moy To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Sep 22 15:00:40 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VNjHE-0002QK-4X for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:00:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752928Ab3IVNAf (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2013 09:00:35 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:53732 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752890Ab3IVNAe (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Sep 2013 09:00:34 -0400 Received: from [192.168.178.41] ([79.193.89.54]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0Mg75d-1Va3SX2jVl-00NPi2 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 2013 15:00:32 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ymXvufaNoNYpJC9te4k0Nat253xPQiAYge1tqbEDDBAc5wN9/Ya afbD8WbgqN63Ztue2tOID1RRlz1Bt67DTFVrunO2KfZ3Nfvnw4dn9JgzR1AesJ8MdtqtB8g vWimDpXAFm5L55ogufKfzJC8IF3NnlPnf/icBzUoLBDimRy7HQEhB++1aR7XQ02n3TL2PLo OvdNeMYgDKBX/KM/hOjqw== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 21.09.2013 00:29, schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Jens Lehmann writes: > >> Am 10.09.2013 00:53, schrieb Junio C Hamano: >>> * bc/submodule-status-ignored (2013-09-04) 2 commits >>> - submodule: don't print status output with ignore=all >>> - submodule: fix confusing variable name >>> >>> Originally merged to 'next' on 2013-08-22 >>> >>> Will merge to 'next'. >> >> I propose to cook this some time in next to give submodule >> users who have configured ignore=all the opportunity to test >> and comment on that. And as Matthieu noticed the documentation >> is not terribly clear here, I'll prepare one or two patches to >> fix that which should go in together with these changes. > > The patches are still in 'next' but I think with the documentation > update you and Matthieu did, it should be ready to be in 'master' > now, no? No objections from my side as nobody reported any problems during the month that series cooked in next.