From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2013, #04; Fri, 18)
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 02:35:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526236377d37e_4e9f1021e84d4@nysa.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131019063447.GA18977@sigill.intra.peff.net>
Jeff King wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 03:14:49PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
> > * jn/add-2.0-u-A-sans-pathspec (2013-04-26) 1 commit
> > - git add: -u/-A now affects the entire working tree
> >
> > Will cook in 'next' until Git 2.0.
> >
> >
> > * jc/core-checkstat-2.0 (2013-05-06) 1 commit
> > - core.statinfo: remove as promised in Git 2.0
> >
> > Will cook in 'next' until Git 2.0.
> >
> >
> > * jc/push-2.0-default-to-simple (2013-06-18) 1 commit
> > - push: switch default from "matching" to "simple"
> >
> > Will cook in 'next' until Git 2.0.
> >
> >
> > * jc/add-2.0-ignore-removal (2013-04-22) 1 commit
> > - git add <pathspec>... defaults to "-A"
> >
> > Updated endgame for "git add <pathspec>" that defaults to "--all"
> > aka "--no-ignore-removal".
> >
> > Will cook in 'next' until Git 2.0.
>
> I notice that these are not actually in 'next', despite the
> descriptions. Should they be, to give them wider exposure?
I say they shouldn't be, unless the next version after 1.8 is 2.0. There should
be a separate branch for 2.0.
--
Felipe Contreras
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-19 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-18 22:14 What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2013, #04; Fri, 18) Junio C Hamano
2013-10-19 6:34 ` Jeff King
2013-10-19 7:35 ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2013-10-22 15:20 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526236377d37e_4e9f1021e84d4@nysa.notmuch \
--to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).