From: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>
To: "Vicent Martí" <tanoku@gmail.com>,
"Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2013, #07; Mon, 28)
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 18:14:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52713E67.3000202@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFFjANT=-mQoKUU2KsPHo3Hcq7RAuyM1t4kvJu4OfiNeHrA+Ng@mail.gmail.com>
On 2013-10-30 18.01, Vicent Martí wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@web.de> wrote:
>> There is a name clash under cygwin 1.7 (1.5 is OK)
>> The following "first aid hot fix" works for me:
>> /Torsten
>
> If Cygwin declares its own bswap_64, wouldn't it be better to use it
> instead of overwriting it with our own?
Yes,
this will be part of a longer patch.
I found that some systems have something like this:
#define htobe64(x) bswap_64(x)
And bswap_64 is a function, so we can not detect it by "asking"
#ifdef bswap_64
..
#endif
But we can use
#ifdef htobe64
...
#endif
and this will be part of a bigger patch.
And, in general, we should avoid to introduce functions which may have a
name clash.
Using the git_ prefix for function names is a good practice.
So in order to unbrake the compilation error under cygwin 17,
the "hotfix" can be used.
/Torsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-30 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-28 19:28 What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2013, #07; Mon, 28) Junio C Hamano
2013-10-28 21:58 ` Thomas Rast
2013-10-30 16:51 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2013-10-30 17:01 ` Vicent Martí
2013-10-30 17:14 ` Torsten Bögershausen [this message]
2013-10-30 17:39 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2013-10-30 19:11 ` Ramsay Jones
2013-10-30 19:06 ` Ramsay Jones
2013-10-30 20:30 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2013-10-30 21:07 ` Ramsay Jones
2013-10-31 13:24 ` htonll, ntohll Torsten Bögershausen
2013-11-05 0:00 ` Ramsay Jones
2013-11-06 15:58 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2013-11-12 14:44 ` Jakub Narębski
2013-11-13 12:20 ` Andreas Ericsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52713E67.3000202@web.de \
--to=tboegi@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=tanoku@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).