From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Yann Dirson" Subject: gitk: showing onging merge as such ? Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 13:46:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <53018.10.0.0.1.1241696812.squirrel@intranet.linagora.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu May 07 13:57:23 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M22E7-0003LH-3c for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 07 May 2009 13:57:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754991AbZEGL5Q (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 07:57:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754085AbZEGL5P (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 07:57:15 -0400 Received: from alderaan.linagora.com ([84.14.148.74]:47982 "EHLO alderaan.linagora.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752193AbZEGL5O (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2009 07:57:14 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 626 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Thu, 07 May 2009 07:57:14 EDT Received: from 10.0.0.2 (unknown [10.75.192.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alderaan.linagora.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50B57429F28 for ; Thu, 7 May 2009 13:46:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 10.0.0.1 (proxying for 10.75.161.7) (SquirrelMail authenticated user ydirson) by intranet.linagora.com with HTTP; Thu, 7 May 2009 13:46:52 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.11 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: While resolving a conflicted merge, I wondered if there was any reason why gitk does not show that we are indeed doing a merge, by showing the staged contents as a merge commit if MERGE_HEAD is found. Is there any reason why we would not do this ? I had a quick try at how this could be done, here it is. The diff is not yet displayed as combined.