From: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
To: Lee Hopkins <leerhop@gmail.com>
Cc: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Branch Name Case Sensitivity
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:00:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530FA77B.2030707@alum.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJHY66H2M2aQvQ8MLN7XB4uYiFohRfhhsXhd56hwDR5qMGi6Tg@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/27/2014 09:37 PM, Lee Hopkins wrote:
>> Perhaps git-{branch,tag}.txt and possibly gitrepository-layout.txt
>> in Documentation/ may need a new "*Note*" section to warn against
>> this.
>
> A little more documentation never hurt anyone :).
>
>> Or we can possibly trigger this function at the the of
>> "checkout -b" or "fetch" commands ?
>> Only when core.ignorecase == true ?
>
> This would essentially make git always use packed-refs when
> core.ignorecase == true, correct? Are there any downsides to always
> using packed-refs?
There are at least two reasons I can think of:
1. Efficiency: any time a reference changes, the whole packed-refs file
would have to be read and written as opposed to a single, small
loose-ref file.
2. Lock contention: two processes can modify loose references at the
same time without contending with each other. If they always wrote the
packed-refs file, there would be more lock contention (which in the git
world means that one of the processes would fail).
Whether these are concern for a single user using a local git repository
(as opposed to git running on a server) mostly depends on how many
references you have. With a hundred references you would probably not
notice any difference. With ten thousand you probably would. Somewhere
in between lies the pain threshold.
Michael
--
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu
http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-27 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 21:06 Branch Name Case Sensitivity Lee Hopkins
2014-02-27 19:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-27 20:32 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-02-27 20:37 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-02-27 21:00 ` Michael Haggerty [this message]
2014-02-27 22:24 ` Karsten Blees
2014-02-27 23:38 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-02-28 6:41 ` Johannes Sixt
2014-02-28 13:56 ` Karsten Blees
2014-02-28 14:10 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-02-28 18:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-28 23:22 ` Duy Nguyen
2014-02-28 23:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-01 2:42 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-03-01 6:54 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-03-01 19:38 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-03-03 10:03 ` Karsten Blees
2014-03-03 14:21 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-03-03 17:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-04 13:23 ` Karsten Blees
2014-03-04 20:37 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-03-05 14:02 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-02-28 9:13 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-02-28 14:31 ` Duy Nguyen
2014-02-28 14:45 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-02-28 9:11 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-28 9:49 ` Michael Haggerty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530FA77B.2030707@alum.mit.edu \
--to=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=leerhop@gmail.com \
--cc=tboegi@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).