From: Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>
To: Lee Hopkins <leerhop@gmail.com>, Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@gmail.com>
Cc: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Branch Name Case Sensitivity
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:41:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53102FB0.6040603@viscovery.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJHY66FtC03YbJrbVn+adsePkYnVD2RGH1TGkzz2pKNBoee_iQ@mail.gmail.com>
Am 2/28/2014 0:38, schrieb Lee Hopkins:
>> If I understand the issue correctly, the problem is that packed-refs
>> are always case-sensitive, even if core.ignorecase=true. OTOH,
core.ignorecase is intended to affect filenames of the worktree, not
anything else, BTW.
>> checking / updating _unpacked_ refs on a case-insensitive file system
>> is naturally case-insensitive. So wouldn't it be a better workaround
>> to disallow packed refs (i.e. 'git config gc.packrefs false')?
>
> You are correct, the issue boils down to mixing the usage of
> packed-refs and loose refs on case insensitive file systems. So either
> always using packed-refs or always using loose refs would take care of
> the problem. Based Michael Haggerty's response, it seems that always
> using loose refs would be a better workaround.
So, everybody on a case-insensitive file system should pay the price even
if they do not need the "feature"? No way.
If you are on a case-insensitive filesystem, or work on a cross-platform
project, ensure that you avoid ambiguous refs. Problem solved.
-- Hannes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-28 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 21:06 Branch Name Case Sensitivity Lee Hopkins
2014-02-27 19:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-27 20:32 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-02-27 20:37 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-02-27 21:00 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-02-27 22:24 ` Karsten Blees
2014-02-27 23:38 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-02-28 6:41 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2014-02-28 13:56 ` Karsten Blees
2014-02-28 14:10 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-02-28 18:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-28 23:22 ` Duy Nguyen
2014-02-28 23:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-01 2:42 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-03-01 6:54 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-03-01 19:38 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-03-03 10:03 ` Karsten Blees
2014-03-03 14:21 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-03-03 17:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-04 13:23 ` Karsten Blees
2014-03-04 20:37 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-03-05 14:02 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-02-28 9:13 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-02-28 14:31 ` Duy Nguyen
2014-02-28 14:45 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-02-28 9:11 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-28 9:49 ` Michael Haggerty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53102FB0.6040603@viscovery.net \
--to=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=karsten.blees@gmail.com \
--cc=leerhop@gmail.com \
--cc=tboegi@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).