From: "Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>
To: Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Lee Hopkins <leerhop@gmail.com>
Cc: "Duy Nguyen" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
"Johannes Sixt" <j.sixt@viscovery.net>,
"Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Branch Name Case Sensitivity
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2014 21:37:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53163992.20701@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5315D3B9.6050602@gmail.com>
On 2014-03-04 14.23, Karsten Blees wrote:
> Am 03.03.2014 18:51, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> Lee Hopkins <leerhop@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I went ahead and took a stab at a solution. My solution is more
>>> aggressive than a warning, I actually prevent the creation of
>>> ambiguous refs. My changes are also in refs.c, which may not be
>>> appropriate, but it seemed like the natural place.
>>>
>>> I have never contributed to Git (in fact this is my first dive into
>>> the source) and my C is a bit rusty, so bear with me, this is just a
>>> suggestion:
>>>
>>> ---
>>> refs.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>> 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> Starting something like this from forbidding is likely to turn out
>> to be a very bad idea that can break existing repositories.
>>
>
> Its sure worth considering what should be done with pre-existing duplicates. However, repositories with such refs are already broken on case-insensitive filesystems, and allowing something that's known to be broken is even more dangerous, IMO.
>
> An alternative approach could be to encode upper-case letters in loose refs if core.ignorecase == true (e.g. "Foo" -> "%46oo"). Although this may pose a problem for commands that bypass the refs API / plumbing for whatever reason.
>
>> A new configuration
>>
>> refs.caseInsensitive = {warn|error|allow}
>>
>
> s/caseInsensitive/caseSensitive/
> Its case-sensitive refs that cause trouble, case-insensitive refs would be fine on all platforms.
>
> I still don't see why we need an extra setting for this. The problems are inherently caused by case-insensitive filesystems, and we already have 'core.ignorecase' for that (its even automatically configured). Having an extra setting for refs is somewhat like making 'core.ignorecase' configurable per sub-directory.
I start to agree here.
The case-insensitive file system does not allow branches foo and Foo at the same time,
and the packed refs should simply follow this convention/restriction/behaviour.
(and everything else could and should go into another patch:
If we ever want Linux to ignore the case in refs,
to ease the cross-platform development with Windows.
Or if we allow Windows/Mac OS to handle case insensitive refs (by always packing them)
to ease the co-working with e.g. Linux.
)
Lee, could you improve your change in refs.c into a real patch, with a commit message?
(And please have a look at the indentation with TABs)
A test case could be good, if time allows I can make a suggestion.
Thanks for all comments
/Torsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-04 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-26 21:06 Branch Name Case Sensitivity Lee Hopkins
2014-02-27 19:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-27 20:32 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-02-27 20:37 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-02-27 21:00 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-02-27 22:24 ` Karsten Blees
2014-02-27 23:38 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-02-28 6:41 ` Johannes Sixt
2014-02-28 13:56 ` Karsten Blees
2014-02-28 14:10 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-02-28 18:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-02-28 23:22 ` Duy Nguyen
2014-02-28 23:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-01 2:42 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-03-01 6:54 ` Torsten Bögershausen
2014-03-01 19:38 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-03-03 10:03 ` Karsten Blees
2014-03-03 14:21 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-03-03 17:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-04 13:23 ` Karsten Blees
2014-03-04 20:37 ` Torsten Bögershausen [this message]
2014-03-05 14:02 ` Lee Hopkins
2014-02-28 9:13 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-02-28 14:31 ` Duy Nguyen
2014-02-28 14:45 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-02-28 9:11 ` Stephen Leake
2014-02-28 9:49 ` Michael Haggerty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53163992.20701@web.de \
--to=tboegi@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j.sixt@viscovery.net \
--cc=karsten.blees@gmail.com \
--cc=leerhop@gmail.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).