From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Branchaud Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] reset: Print a warning when user uses "git reset" during a merge Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:23:43 -0400 Message-ID: <5324A8BF.80308@xiplink.com> References: <1394771872-25940-1-git-send-email-andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> <1394771872-25940-4-git-send-email-andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> <5323131C.7070506@xiplink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" To: Junio C Hamano , Andrew Wong X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 15 20:32:13 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WOuJU-0004TX-53 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 20:32:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753778AbaCOTbj (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:31:39 -0400 Received: from smtp130.ord.emailsrvr.com ([173.203.6.130]:53935 "EHLO smtp130.ord.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750900AbaCOTbi (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:31:38 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 473 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:31:38 EDT Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp13.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A8A1A198645; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:23:44 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp13.relay.ord1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: mbranchaud-AT-xiplink.com) with ESMTPSA id 4081B198D94; Sat, 15 Mar 2014 15:23:44 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 14-03-14 04:55 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > So I am OK with "eventually error out by default", but not OK with > "we know better than the user and will not allow it at all". Can I interpret that as you being OK with my proposed "Cowardly refusing" approach? M.