From: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>
To: Ronald Weiss <weiss.ronald@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.1] commit: add --ignore-submodules[=<when>] parameter
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:53:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <533C5CBD.4050601@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <533B36AA.3090600@gmail.com>
Am 01.04.2014 23:59, schrieb Ronald Weiss:
> On 1. 4. 2014 22:23, Jens Lehmann wrote:
>> Am 01.04.2014 01:35, schrieb Ronald Weiss:
>>> On 1. 4. 2014 0:50, Ronald Weiss wrote:
>>>> On 31. 3. 2014 23:47, Ronald Weiss wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:58 PM, Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> wrote:
>>>>>> As Junio mentioned it would be great if you could teach the add
>>>>>> command also honor the --ignore-submodule command line option in
>>>>>> a companion patch. In the course of doing so you'll easily see if
>>>>>> I was right or not, then please just order them in the most logical
>>>>>> way.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, if You (or Junio) really don't want my patch without another one
>>>>> for git add, I may try to do it. However, git add does not even honor
>>>>> the submodules' ignore setting from .gitmodules (just tested with git
>>>>> 1.9.1: "git add -u" doesn't honor it, while "git commit -a" does). So
>>>>> teaching git add the --ignore-submodules switch in current state
>>>>> doesn't seem right to me. You might propose to add also support for
>>>>> the ignore setting, to make "add -u" and "commit -a" more consistent.
>>>>> That seems like a good idea, but the effort needed is getting bigger,
>>>>
>>>> Well, now I actually looked at it, and it was pretty easy after all.
>>>> The changes below seem to enable support for both ignore setting in
>>>> .gitmodules, and also --ignore-submodules switch, for git add, on top
>>>> of my patch for commit.
>>>
>>> There is a catch. With the changes below, submodules are ignored by add even if explitely named on command line (eg. "git add x" does nothing if x is submodule with new commits, but with ignore=all in .gitmodules).
>>> That doesn't seem right.
>>>
>>> Any ideas, what to do about that? When exactly should such submodule be actually ignored?
>>
>> Me thinks git add should require the '-f' option to add an ignored
>> submodule (just like it does for files) unless the user uses the
>> '--ignore-submodules=none' option. And if neither of these are given
>> it should "fail with a list of ignored files" as the documentation
>> states.
>
> It's still not clear, at least not to me. Should '-f' suppress the
> ignore setting of all involved submodules? That would make it a
> synonyme (or a superset) of --ignore-submodules=none. Or only if the
> submodule is explicitly named on command line? That seems fuzzy to me,
> and also more tricky to implement.
Maybe my impression that doing "add" together with "commit" would be
easy wasn't correct after all. I won't object if you try to tackle
commit first (but I have the slight suspicion that similar questions
will arise concerning the "add"ish functionality in commit too. So
maybe after resolving those things might look clearer ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-03 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-27 23:36 git commit vs. ignore-submodules Ronald Weiss
2014-03-28 16:47 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-03-28 17:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-03-29 22:44 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-03-29 22:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] commit: add --ignore-submodules[=<when>] parameter Ronald Weiss
2014-03-29 23:14 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-03-30 19:48 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-03-30 23:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Ronald Weiss
2014-03-31 0:07 ` [PATCH v2.1] " Ronald Weiss
2014-03-31 18:58 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-03-31 20:37 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-03-31 21:50 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-03-31 21:47 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-03-31 22:50 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-03-31 23:35 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-04-01 20:23 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-04-01 21:59 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-04-02 18:53 ` Jens Lehmann [this message]
2014-04-02 19:56 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-04-06 16:28 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-04-07 21:46 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-04-07 23:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] add: " Ronald Weiss
2014-04-07 23:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] commit: " Ronald Weiss
2014-04-08 18:43 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-04-08 20:19 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-04-12 22:20 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-04-12 22:45 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] add: " Ronald Weiss
2014-04-18 11:53 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-04-21 21:19 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-04-12 22:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] commit: " Ronald Weiss
2014-04-18 12:09 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-04-21 22:08 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-04-22 19:14 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-04-22 21:12 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] add: " Ronald Weiss
2014-04-23 20:25 ` Eric Sunshine
2014-04-24 19:34 ` [PATCH v6 " Ronald Weiss
2014-04-24 19:42 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] commit: " Ronald Weiss
2014-04-22 21:13 ` [PATCH v5 " Ronald Weiss
2014-04-14 18:30 ` [PATCH v3 " Junio C Hamano
2014-04-14 20:18 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-04-14 21:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-08 18:26 ` [PATCH v2.1] " Jens Lehmann
2014-04-12 23:41 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-04-18 12:28 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-04-22 22:21 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-03-31 17:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Junio C Hamano
2014-03-29 22:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] status: don't ignore submodules added to index Ronald Weiss
2014-03-29 23:16 ` Jens Lehmann
2014-03-29 23:40 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-03-30 0:01 ` Ronald Weiss
2014-03-30 10:14 ` [WIP/PATCH] status/commit: always show staged submodules regardless of ignore config Jens Lehmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=533C5CBD.4050601@web.de \
--to=jens.lehmann@web.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=hvoigt@hvoigt.net \
--cc=weiss.ronald@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).