From: Ilya Bobyr <ilya.bobyr@gmail.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RTC/PATCH] Add 'update-branch' hook
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 23:05:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535606A3.8040704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53559a8333aaa_6c39e772f07f@nysa.notmuch>
On 4/21/2014 3:24 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Ilya Bobyr wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Felipe Contreras <
>> felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Ilya Bobyr wrote:
>>>> test_expect_success 'setup' "
>>>> mkdir -p .git/hooks &&
>>>> cat > .git/hooks/update-branch <<-\\EOF &&
>>>> #!/bin/sh
>>>> echo \$@ > .git/update-branch.args
>>>> EOF
>>>> chmod +x .git/hooks/update-branch &&
>>>> echo one > content &&
>>>> git add content &&
>>>> git commit -a -m one
>>>> "
>>> That is not maintainable at all.
>> Maybe you could explain how is this less maintainable, compared to a separate
>> function?
> Do I really have to explain that manually escaping a shell script is not
> maintainable?
This is rude.
Here is how you can do it without escaping:
test_expect_success 'setup' '
mkdir -p .git/hooks &&
cat > .git/hooks/update-branch <<-\EOF &&
#!/bin/sh
echo $@ > .git/update-branch.args
EOF
chmod +x .git/hooks/update-branch &&
echo one > content &&
git add content &&
git commit -a -m one
'
It is not different from most of the tests, I think.
>> This is how it is suggested by t/README and how it is done in the other
>> test suites.
>> I can not see how your case is different, but I might be missing something.
> Let's take a cursoy look at `git grep -l "'EOF'" t`.
>
> [...]
So the point is that some existing tests violate best practices?
I do not think this is a good justification to do the same for new tests.
> In fact my version is actually cleaner than these, because the code that is run
> outside the cage is clearly delimited by a function.
It depends on the perspective.
If it fails, the failure would be missed regardless of if it is in a
function or not.
Most examples that you quoted only create files outside test_expect_success.
Even that is not necessary.
I am not telling you how you should write it.
I am just saying that you are breaking one of the recommendations on how
to write tests.
There are different options that adhere to the suggestions in t/README.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-22 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-21 2:23 [RTC/PATCH] Add 'update-branch' hook Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 7:25 ` Eric Sunshine
2014-04-21 20:02 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 20:49 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:15 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:17 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:39 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:36 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 14:43 ` Stephen Leake
2014-04-22 16:31 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 17:09 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 17:28 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23 7:49 ` Stephen Leake
2014-04-23 9:07 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23 22:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-24 1:11 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-26 17:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-26 19:28 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-24 14:26 ` Stephen Leake
2014-04-24 18:08 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-21 22:26 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 23:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-23 21:30 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23 22:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-24 1:00 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 6:41 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 16:30 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:17 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:15 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:36 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:35 ` Felipe Contreras
[not found] ` <CADcHDF+XcWEkvyP3tL4ibicnaMVJpixUZu1Ces0BXWkzPGsodw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-21 22:24 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 6:05 ` Ilya Bobyr [this message]
2014-04-22 6:45 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 7:00 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 6:56 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 6:35 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 16:27 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535606A3.8040704@gmail.com \
--to=ilya.bobyr@gmail.com \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).