git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Bobyr <ilya.bobyr@gmail.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RTC/PATCH] Add 'update-branch' hook
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 23:05:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <535606A3.8040704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53559a8333aaa_6c39e772f07f@nysa.notmuch>

On 4/21/2014 3:24 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Ilya Bobyr wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Felipe Contreras <
>> felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Ilya Bobyr wrote:
>>>> test_expect_success 'setup' "
>>>>       mkdir -p .git/hooks &&
>>>>       cat > .git/hooks/update-branch <<-\\EOF &&
>>>>       #!/bin/sh
>>>>       echo \$@ > .git/update-branch.args
>>>>       EOF
>>>>       chmod +x .git/hooks/update-branch &&
>>>>       echo one > content &&
>>>>       git add content &&
>>>>       git commit -a -m one
>>>> "
>>> That is not maintainable at all.
>> Maybe you could explain how is this less maintainable, compared to a separate
>> function?
> Do I really have to explain that manually escaping a shell script is not
> maintainable?

This is rude.

Here is how you can do it without escaping:

test_expect_success 'setup' '
	mkdir -p .git/hooks &&
	cat > .git/hooks/update-branch <<-\EOF &&
	#!/bin/sh
	echo $@ > .git/update-branch.args
	EOF
	chmod +x .git/hooks/update-branch &&
	echo one > content &&
	git add content &&
	git commit -a -m one
'

It is not different from most of the tests, I think.

>> This is how it is suggested by t/README and how it is done in the other
>> test suites.
>> I can not see how your case is different, but I might be missing something.
> Let's take a cursoy look at `git grep -l "'EOF'" t`.
>
> [...]

So the point is that some existing tests violate best practices?
I do not think this is a good justification to do the same for new tests.

> In fact my version is actually cleaner than these, because the code that is run
> outside the cage is clearly delimited by a function.

It depends on the perspective.
If it fails, the failure would be missed regardless of if it is in a
function or not.
Most examples that you quoted only create files outside test_expect_success.
Even that is not necessary.

I am not telling you how you should write it.
I am just saying that you are breaking one of the recommendations on how
to write tests.
There are different options that adhere to the suggestions in t/README.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-22  6:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-21  2:23 [RTC/PATCH] Add 'update-branch' hook Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21  7:25 ` Eric Sunshine
2014-04-21 20:02 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 20:49   ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:15     ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:17       ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:39         ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:36           ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 14:43             ` Stephen Leake
2014-04-22 16:31               ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 17:09                 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 17:28                   ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23  7:49                 ` Stephen Leake
2014-04-23  9:07                   ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23 22:44                     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-24  1:11                       ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-26 17:38                         ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-26 19:28                           ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-24 14:26                     ` Stephen Leake
2014-04-24 18:08                       ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:52           ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-21 22:26             ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 23:00               ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-23 21:30                 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23 22:15                   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-24  1:00                     ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22  6:41     ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 16:30       ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:17 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:15   ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 21:36     ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-21 21:35       ` Felipe Contreras
     [not found]         ` <CADcHDF+XcWEkvyP3tL4ibicnaMVJpixUZu1Ces0BXWkzPGsodw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-04-21 22:24           ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22  6:05             ` Ilya Bobyr [this message]
2014-04-22  6:45               ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22  7:00                 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22  6:56                   ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22  6:35 ` Ilya Bobyr
2014-04-22 16:27   ` Felipe Contreras

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=535606A3.8040704@gmail.com \
    --to=ilya.bobyr@gmail.com \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).