git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org>, David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>
Cc: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mergetool: run prompt only if guessed tool
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:24:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <53560b09bbe96_2400128531085@nysa.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140422060120.GA10198@hashpling.org>

Charles Bailey wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 09:59:52PM -0700, David Aguilar wrote:
> > [Cc:ing Charles in case he has an opinion, this behavior dates back to the original MT]
> > 
> > On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 07:17:34PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > > It's annoying to see the prompt:
> > > 
> > >   Hit return to start merge resolution tool (foo):
> > > 
> > > Every time the user does 'git mergetool' even if the user already
> > > configured 'foo' as the wanted tool.
> > > 
> > > Display this prompt only when the user hasn't explicitly configured a
> > > tool.
> > 
> > I agree this is probably helpful.
> > Most users I've met end up configuring mergetool.prompt=false.
> 
> From my memory, the reason that we choose to prompt by default is to
> help new users or users who have just changed their choice of mergetool.
> 
> Because we never use the exit code of the tool to determine whether a
> tool "worked", if we don't prompt and the tool fails (bad custom
> command, requires X when no X available, etc.) then we'll repeatedly run
> the command for all paths requiring resolution leading to, potentially,
> a lot of trace with whatever error the tool might happen to report.
> 
> We prompt by default to give users a chance to abort the mergetool
> session at the first opportunity that they see that the configured tool
> is not working.

This is what I get when a tool is not working:

  Documentation/config.txt seems unchanged.
  Was the merge successful? [y/n]

> Personally, I leave mergetool.prompt unset (default true) because one
> extra click in a complex merge resolution is relatively low overhead and
> to catch myself when I forget that I'm in a no-X environment.
> 
> I glanced at the patch and it seems to subvert this intent for users
> who have  configured a merge tool. Is my understanding correct?

Yes, that's correct. If the user has *manually* configured a tool, why would
you ask him again? We are annoying the overwhelming the vast majority of users
who already configured the right tool in order to avoid issues with a minute
minority that might potentially but unlikely have a problem once or twice.

That's not productive.

-- 
Felipe Contreras

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-22  6:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-21  0:17 [PATCH 0/2] Simple default fixes for v2.0 Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21  0:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] merge: enable defaulttoupstream by default Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 19:53   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-21  0:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] mergetool: run prompt only if guessed tool Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22  4:59   ` David Aguilar
2014-04-22  6:01     ` Charles Bailey
2014-04-22  6:24       ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2014-04-22  6:55         ` Charles Bailey
2014-04-22  6:53           ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22  7:30             ` Charles Bailey
2014-04-22  7:56               ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23  7:56                 ` Charles Bailey
2014-04-23 17:07                   ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-24 18:30                     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-22 17:19     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-23  7:58       ` David Aguilar
2014-04-23 16:52         ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-22 17:32     ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-22 19:55       ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=53560b09bbe96_2400128531085@nysa.notmuch \
    --to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=charles@hashpling.org \
    --cc=davvid@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).