From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org>,
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mergetool: run prompt only if guessed tool
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 01:53:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535611fac1b7b_268bd0b308f5@nysa.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140422065549.GA11224@hashpling.org>
Charles Bailey wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:24:09AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >
> > This is what I get when a tool is not working:
> >
> > Documentation/config.txt seems unchanged.
> > Was the merge successful? [y/n]
>
> Does this happen now even with merge tools for which we do trust the
> exit code? If so, my original concern is addressed.
Which tools are those?
> > > Personally, I leave mergetool.prompt unset (default true) because one
> > > extra click in a complex merge resolution is relatively low overhead and
> > > to catch myself when I forget that I'm in a no-X environment.
> > >
> > > I glanced at the patch and it seems to subvert this intent for users
> > > who have configured a merge tool. Is my understanding correct?
> >
> > Yes, that's correct. If the user has *manually* configured a tool, why would
> > you ask him again? We are annoying the overwhelming the vast majority of users
> > who already configured the right tool in order to avoid issues with a minute
> > minority that might potentially but unlikely have a problem once or twice.
> >
> > That's not productive.
>
> We're asking to user to signal that he's happy to launch the mergetool
> and implicitly giving him an opportunity to break out of the session.
> I don't see anything wrong with having this behaviour.
You don't see anything wrong with asking the user *every single time* he runs
`git mergetool`, even though he *already told us* which tool to use?
If so, I'm pretty sure everybody else disagrees with you.
--
Felipe Contreras
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-22 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-21 0:17 [PATCH 0/2] Simple default fixes for v2.0 Felipe Contreras
2014-04-21 0:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] merge: enable defaulttoupstream by default Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 19:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-21 0:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] mergetool: run prompt only if guessed tool Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 4:59 ` David Aguilar
2014-04-22 6:01 ` Charles Bailey
2014-04-22 6:24 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-22 6:55 ` Charles Bailey
2014-04-22 6:53 ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2014-04-22 7:30 ` Charles Bailey
2014-04-22 7:56 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-23 7:56 ` Charles Bailey
2014-04-23 17:07 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-24 18:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-22 17:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-23 7:58 ` David Aguilar
2014-04-23 16:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-22 17:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-22 19:55 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535611fac1b7b_268bd0b308f5@nysa.notmuch \
--to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=charles@hashpling.org \
--cc=davvid@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).