Re: Recording the current branch on each commit?

[Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>]

James Denholm wrote:
> On 29 April 2014 23:31:29 GMT+10:00, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> wrote:
> >James Denholm wrote:
> >> So that we can all have egg on our faces when it takes off and is
> >> proven superior... Right?
> >
> >I don't know what you mean by "we", but it certainly doesn't include
> >you.
> >
> >  % git log --author=nod.helm@gmail.com master
> >  empty
> 
> Sure it does.

No it doesn't. Unless you have some credentials in the Git community,
which come after several contributions, your opinion carries no weight
at all. This might not be ideal, but that's the way it is.

You have no credentials, your opinion doesn't count. You are not part of
the "we" you referred before.

> So I'll ask again - you've described frustration at the
> pace of git development, and that you feel that your patches
> aren't being accepted. If you feel that this is ultimately to the
> fatal detriment of git, why are you still trying to convince
> vegetarians to join you in hunting when you could simply find
> a more willing group?

If by convince you mean apply my patches, my patches are still getting
applied [1].

Either way your analogy is completely wrong as I already explained
multiple times. I'm not trying to convince vegetarians to go hunting,
I'm saying they should eat something, bread, meat, vegetables, anything.
Instead they choose to starve to death.

And I'm done discussing with you. Your comments are content-free.

[1] https://www.ohloh.net/p/git/contributors?sort=latest_commit

-- 
Felipe Contreras