From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de>,
John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
Richard Hansen <rhansen@bbn.com>,
Philip Oakley <philipoakley@iee.org>,
"Brian M. Carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] Reject non-ff pulls by default
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:44:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53614470489f9_f9b15012ecbc@nysa.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqr44eg0s0.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > These are the steps needed to achieve this:
>
> The overall progression (this comment is only about the design, not
> the implementation) looks almost sensible, but I may have missed
> some issues because the presentation was done in reverse.
>
> In the following comment, I'll flip the presentation order to better
> show natural progression of what the users will see.
>
> > 1) Rename pull.rename to pull.mode and
> > branch.<name>.rebase to branch.<name>.pullmode
> >
> > This way the configurations and options remain consistent:
> >
> > git pull --merge
> > pull.mode = merge
> > branch.<name>.pullmode = merge
> >
> > git pull --rebase
> > pull.mode = rebase
> > branch.<name>.pullmode = rebase
> >
> > git pull --rebase=preserve
> > pull.mode = rebase-preserve
> > branch.<name>.pullmode = rebase-preserve
> >
> > git pull
> > pull.mode = merge-ff-only
> > branch.<name>.pullmode = merge-ff-only
>
> Until the "--merge" option is added, "pull.mode = merge" cannot be
> the same as "git pull --merge". I think you either need to squash
> these two steps into one, or flip the order of them.
Yeah, but the documentation of --merge should mention `pull.mode` and
`branch.<name>.pullmode`. If I do --merge first I would have to mention
pull.rebase and branch.<name>.rebase, which is weird.
I think it's more sensible to do the less visible changes first.
> > 2) Add --merge option
> >
> > Since we have a message that says "If unsure, run 'git pull --merge'", which is
> > more friendly than 'git pull --no-rebase', we should add this option, and
> > deprecate --no-rebase.
>
> Obviously s/have a/will have a/, but the intention is good.
>
> > However, the documentation would become confusing if --merge is configured in
> > pull.rebase, instead, we want something like this:
> >
> > See `pull.mode`, `branch.<name>.pullmode` in linkgit:git-config[1] if you want
> > to make `git pull` always use `--merge`.
>
> It gets unclear to me how the transition is planned around here. Is
> this a correct paraphrasing of these four steps?
>
> - Add pull.mode (and its branch-specific friend) and "pull
> --merge" so that people can set the former to "merge" or train
> their fingers to type the latter to keep doing the
> fetch-and-merge (your steps 1 and 2)
>
> - Add ff-only to pull.mode (your step 3)
Correct.
> - With the endgame of "out of box Git without any configuration
> refuses 'git pull' (without --merge/--rebase) that does not
> fast forward" in mind, start warning "In the future you will
> have to either set pull.mode (and/or its friends) or type
> "pull --merge" (or "pull --rebase") when the endgame version
> of 'git pull' would fail with the error message, but still do
> as was asked to do as before. At this step, existing users
> can set pull.mode to "merge" or "rebase" or whatever to
> squelch the warning.
>
> - Flip the default. By the time this happens, thanks to the
> previous step to warn beforehand, nobody needs to see the
> warning. (your step 4)
This is what my last version of the series did[1]. However, my plan was
to land this in 1.x so users could see the warning, and then flip the
switch on 2.0.
This plan, however, fell off the cliff.
> If that is the rough outline, I think it is sensible.
>
> > 3) Add merge-ff-only config
> >
> > This option would trigger a check inside `git pull` itself, and error out with
> > the aforementioned message if it's not possible to do a fast-forward merge.
> >
> > However, this option conflicts with --rebase, and --no-rebase. Solution below.
>
> Am I reading you correctly that setting "pull.mode = ff-only" will
> require you to explicitly say "git pull --merge/--rebase"? If that
> is the case, I think the step makes sense.
pull.mode = merge-ff-only
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/235951
--
Felipe Contreras
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-30 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-29 11:17 [PATCH v5 0/6] Reject non-ff pulls by default Felipe Contreras
2014-04-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] pull: rename pull.rename to pull.mode Felipe Contreras
2014-04-29 12:24 ` Marat Radchenko
2014-04-29 13:32 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-29 21:54 ` Philip Oakley
2014-04-29 22:05 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-29 23:00 ` Philip Oakley
2014-04-30 20:26 ` Richard Hansen
2014-04-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] pull: migrate all the tests " Felipe Contreras
2014-04-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] pull: refactor $rebase variable into $mode Felipe Contreras
2014-04-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] pull: add --merge option Felipe Contreras
2014-04-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] pull: add merge-ff-only option Felipe Contreras
2014-04-29 11:17 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] pull: only allow ff merges by default Felipe Contreras
2014-04-30 17:55 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] Reject non-ff pulls " Junio C Hamano
2014-04-30 18:44 ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2014-04-30 19:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-30 19:22 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-04-30 19:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-04-30 19:28 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53614470489f9_f9b15012ecbc@nysa.notmuch \
--to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=a.krey@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=john@keeping.me.uk \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=philipoakley@iee.org \
--cc=rhansen@bbn.com \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).