From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Haggerty Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Apr 2014, #08; Fri, 25) Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 18:53:32 +0200 Message-ID: <536D080C.7030402@alum.mit.edu> References: <20140425231953.GB3855@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Felipe Contreras To: Jeff King , Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 09 18:53:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wio3I-00055w-6f for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 09 May 2014 18:53:40 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757156AbaEIQxg (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2014 12:53:36 -0400 Received: from alum-mailsec-scanner-3.mit.edu ([18.7.68.14]:58298 "EHLO alum-mailsec-scanner-3.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755882AbaEIQxf (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 May 2014 12:53:35 -0400 X-AuditID: 1207440e-f79c76d000003e2c-71-536d080ea4e7 Received: from outgoing-alum.mit.edu (OUTGOING-ALUM.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.33]) by alum-mailsec-scanner-3.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id DE.0B.15916.E080D635; Fri, 9 May 2014 12:53:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.69.130] (p5DDB2E4D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.219.46.77]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as mhagger@ALUM.MIT.EDU) by outgoing-alum.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id s49GrWXh032402 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 9 May 2014 12:53:33 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: <20140425231953.GB3855@sigill.intra.peff.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrCKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixO6iqMvHkRts0L1P2+Lg4zyLrivdTBYN vVeYLX609DA7sHjsnHWX3eNZ7x5Gj4uXlD0+b5ILYInitklKLCkLzkzP07dL4M543vyIueA3 Z0XTkVVsDYxNHF2MnBwSAiYSH1pmsELYYhIX7q1n62Lk4hASuMwoceveehYI5yyTxKcND5lB qngFtCU+Xz/MAmKzCKhKfJ39mA3EZhPQlVjU08zUxcjBISoQJPHnrCJEuaDEyZlPwMpFBBwl Lmw5AmYzC7hJPP76gR3EFhawl3i4Zh/YEUICGRJn+p+A2ZwCVhI3Jz1nBRkpISAu0dMYBGIy C6hLrJ8nBDFFXmL72znMExgFZyFZNguhahaSqgWMzKsY5RJzSnN1cxMzc4pTk3WLkxPz8lKL dI31cjNL9FJTSjcxQsKbbwdj+3qZQ4wCHIxKPLwSr3OChVgTy4orcw8xSnIwKYnyPmfMDRbi S8pPqcxILM6ILyrNSS0+xCjBwawkwlvxGaicNyWxsiq1KB8mJc3BoiTOq7ZE3U9IID2xJDU7 NbUgtQgmK8PBoSTB+4oNaKhgUWp6akVaZk4JQpqJgxNkOJeUSHFqXkpqUWJpSUY8KHbji4HR C5LiAdrLyg7UzltckJgLFIVoPcVozPHl1/IWJo4LDStamIRY8vLzUqXEeXeCbBIAKc0ozYNb BEtsrxjFgf4W5n0IUsUDTIpw814BrWICWuWrnw2yqiQRISXVwMh/qeSQe5O85t3ZLModBVVl /DYTcqY9DbyzWGGC66e1RVxvE2/9Ou5Vki/UkHJPx+3p31Mxp8oX++t+d1zb/Kzq Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 04/26/2014 01:19 AM, Jeff King wrote: > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 03:50:26PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > [...] >> * fc/publish-vs-upstream (2014-04-21) 8 commits >> - sha1_name: add support for @{publish} marks >> - sha1_name: simplify track finding >> - sha1_name: cleanup interpret_branch_name() >> - branch: display publish branch >> - push: add --set-publish option >> - branch: add --set-publish-to option >> - Add concept of 'publish' branch >> - t5516 (fetch-push): fix test restoration >> >> Add branch@{publish}; it seems that this is somewhat different from >> Ram and Peff started working on. There were many discussion >> messages going back and forth but it does not appear that the >> design issues have been worked out among participants yet. > > [...] > As for the patches themselves, I have not reviewed them carefully, and > would prefer not to. As I mentioned before, though, I would prefer the > short "@{p}" not be taken for @{publish} until it has proven itself. Is it too late and/or impossible to think of a different name for either "push" or "publish" so that their single-letter abbreviations don't coincide? Michael -- Michael Haggerty mhagger@alum.mit.edu http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/