From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Contreras Subject: Re: Should git-remote-hg/bzr be part of the core? Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 03:12:15 -0500 Message-ID: <5370825f709ef_a8114c1304e2@nysa.notmuch> References: <537008f06ceb8_8e47492f89f@nysa.notmuch> <53707b5955034_2b5710592f8aa@nysa.notmuch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git-fc@googlegroups.com, Richard Hansen , Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org, Dusty Phillips , Antoine Pelisse , John Keeping , Christophe Simonis , =?UTF-8?B?VG9yc3RlbiBCw7ZnZXJzaGF1c2Vu?= To: Felipe Contreras , Linus Torvalds , Felipe Contreras X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 12 10:23:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WjlW0-0000t6-Nf for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 12 May 2014 10:23:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753565AbaELIXL (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2014 04:23:11 -0400 Received: from mail-ob0-f178.google.com ([209.85.214.178]:42476 "EHLO mail-ob0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753394AbaELIXJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 May 2014 04:23:09 -0400 Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id va2so7790914obc.9 for ; Mon, 12 May 2014 01:23:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aDh0O92RWCjCwAKczWVvCUETfgHlR9NYO0Z7E4zcPOM=; b=wBRT5ysiCpbRLvR+zVuWf/wYfMH9WVBXeNTegkKBoCPL2XbRuZST7QXocl03J7420n bshLVRYZPJKf/Dj+zGwBc4ik3D0ZHMrJ2yiKTy1WRYR3SUQiBheE7xT7L2q3ZkMGJifw VHK9aIFeQUopv9du/WtI78EaGWzp3qa3M+Dik0EAw0mpTmkM0XPQPkg2wy3kDQwZmbTt NItB0EeKYtNhjaqNEbacFBSsoY1sOVdgXlye7kdpPgTMYGme/8y2OZD5OPieOtUXokIQ Sd5j+VpDFICKBTjh+1oA3eLl1YzOKrZppLFhKM6++rL8JnTUxY/pUffGqVvgNw5M+X1a OTcg== X-Received: by 10.182.236.229 with SMTP id ux5mr31633638obc.12.1399882989085; Mon, 12 May 2014 01:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (189-211-224-40.static.axtel.net. [189.211.224.40]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ub1sm46672164oeb.9.2014.05.12.01.23.07 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 12 May 2014 01:23:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53707b5955034_2b5710592f8aa@nysa.notmuch> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Felipe Contreras wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Felipe, stop this stupid blaming of everybody but yourself. > > Show me evidence that this decision was my fault. Junio certainly hasn't > said so. You just have no idea what we are talking about. Here, let me show you. Junio, can you answer these questions? 1) What is missing from git-remote-hg/bzr in order for them to be considered to be merged to the core? 2) If a different maintainer steps up, would you consider reconsider merging them to the core? 3) Is there any chance that in the future you would consider them after they are more mature, and/or perhaps with a different maintainer? Unless Junio changes his mind again, the answers to those questions should be clear already to the people following the discussion (i.e. not you). -- Felipe Contreras