From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
To: Paolo Ciarrocchi <paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com>,
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Cc: "Felipe Contreras" <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
"Git Mailing List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
git-fc@googlegroups.com, "Richard Hansen" <rhansen@bbn.com>,
"Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>,
"Antoine Pelisse" <apelisse@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Simonis" <christophe@kn.gl>,
"Dusty Phillips" <dusty@linux.ca>, "Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>,
"John Keeping" <john@keeping.me.uk>
Subject: Re: Should git-remote-hg/bzr be part of the core?
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 07:48:45 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5370c32d7ffc7_168f13a72fc6b@nysa.notmuch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHVLzcmqdkf4fMTok+HsXcDOQ5Oz2QdZti3FuzgBUa2T6AWnfA@mail.gmail.com>
Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>wrote:
>
> > Felipe, you seem to have so much potential. If you would put as
> > much effort in conducting social interactions as you do in coding,
> > the whole balance would change entirely, and any software project
> > would be happy to have you. With all my heart I truly wish you the
> > best in your future endeavors.
>
> I really *love* this paragraph. Felipe, you are a brilliant developer
> and you put a lot of work trying to improve GIT.
Thanks.
> While I agree with you the this project is managed in a bit conservative
> way
Only a bit? I don't think I've been involed in a more conservative open
source project.
> you should really improve how you communicate with other developers,
> it's such a pity your contributions are some times not included in
> git.git just because of your attitude.
But that's a theory. You don't *know* that they would have been included
had I used a different attitude.
In fact, people have contacted me privately saying similar things, and
I'll give you the same challenge I gave them. If you think a different
attitude would get my patches in, how about *you* write the commit
messages and the discussions for one of my stuck patch series. I'll send
the mails as if I had written the content.
If you are right, the different attitude would make the patches land in
no time. I still think it's not right for patches to be rejected simply
because of attitude, but I would accept you were right.
But I think you already know that won't happen, the patches still won't
get in, not because of the attitude, but because of what they are trying
to do: change things.
So if I *know* certain feature would be useful for Git users, I've
listened to all the comments, and addressed all the problems, why would
I give up on those patches? Why would I work on something more boring
that won't benefit users as much but would have higher chances of
getting in?
I'm doing this on my own free time, I can choose to do whatever I want,
in whatever way I want, so no, I'll keep working on what I think is
important.
If you really think the patches can be accepted with a different
attitude, by all means, let's do the experiment and find out.
--
Felipe Contreras
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-12 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-11 23:34 Should git-remote-hg/bzr be part of the core? Felipe Contreras
[not found] ` <CA+55aFwf9iAKxbvdPV9Up_T709KwBXJWW4g-F829CRQP4YkivQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-05-12 7:42 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12 8:12 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12 10:28 ` Stefan Beller
2014-05-12 12:05 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12 9:42 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-05-12 10:35 ` Dennis Kaarsemaker
2014-05-12 10:37 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12 12:05 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-05-12 12:29 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12 13:12 ` David Kastrup
2014-05-12 17:12 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12 13:43 ` Michael Haggerty
2014-05-12 17:13 ` Felipe Contreras
2014-05-12 11:00 ` David Kastrup
[not found] ` <CAHVLzcmqdkf4fMTok+HsXcDOQ5Oz2QdZti3FuzgBUa2T6AWnfA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-05-12 12:48 ` Felipe Contreras [this message]
2014-05-12 13:45 ` Paolo Ciarrocchi
2014-05-12 16:13 ` Stefan Beller
2014-05-12 16:40 ` Felipe Contreras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5370c32d7ffc7_168f13a72fc6b@nysa.notmuch \
--to=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=apelisse@gmail.com \
--cc=christophe@kn.gl \
--cc=dusty@linux.ca \
--cc=git-fc@googlegroups.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=john@keeping.me.uk \
--cc=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=paolo.ciarrocchi@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=rhansen@bbn.com \
--cc=tboegi@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).