From: Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail.com>
To: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@Grenoble-inp.fr>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] config: Add documentation for writing config files
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 01:43:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <538D8AB9.4010800@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <vpq38fnf6go.fsf@anie.imag.fr>
On 06/02/2014 12:37 PM, Matthieu Moy wrote:
> Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/technical/api-config.txt | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Even though the reason to replace a TODO with real stuff is rather
> straigthforward, the reader appriates a short commit message (ideally
> pointing to the commit introducing the TODO). My first thought reading
> the patch was "wtf, is that a patch in the middle of a series, where
> does this TODO come from" ;-).
Ok, I will send a new patch with the updated commit message. .
>> +In the end they both all call `git_config_set_multivar_in_file` which takes
>> +four parameters:
>
> Do we really want to document this as part of the config API? i.e. does
> a normal user of the API want to know about this? My understanding is
> that git_config_set_multivar_in_file is essentially a private function,
> and then the best place to document is with comments near the function
> definition (it already has such comment).
Sorry, but I don't think so. In cache.h, the following functions have been provided
as externs,
git_config_set_in_file()
git_config_set()
git_config_set_multivar()
git_config_set_multivar_in_file()
extern int git_config_rename_section()
extern int git_config_rename_section_in_file()
Thus, they seem to be the part of the API. In most of the technical API docs I have
read there is at least a description of all parameters of the main function also,
relevant data structures if any.
Also a certain amount of redundancy about details is allowed.
A good example is api-hashmap.txt which provides detailed descriptions of each
function and data structure which was very much helpful to me.
Reverse is api-string-list.txt which was useless to me, so I had to go through
the whole code to understand how to use it.
Thanks for the review.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-03 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-06-02 13:27 [PATCH] config: Add documentation for writing config files Tanay Abhra
2014-06-02 19:37 ` Matthieu Moy
2014-06-03 8:43 ` Tanay Abhra [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=538D8AB9.4010800@gmail.com \
--to=tanayabh@gmail.com \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@Grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).