From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lehmann Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2014, #01; Tue, 3) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 23:00:30 +0200 Message-ID: <538F88EE.5070102@web.de> References: <538F7050.3040103@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johan Herland To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 04 23:00:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WsIId-0004UM-MG for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 23:00:44 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751799AbaFDVAj (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2014 17:00:39 -0400 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:62205 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751787AbaFDVAi (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2014 17:00:38 -0400 Received: from [192.168.178.41] ([79.193.71.10]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MXpZD-1XLIKm199j-00WpXq; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 23:00:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:Ug/ZcqH8kd45KfkmzkvIIH832MussEZVJQCvMutteDcfKHR6Oft 5skD3TXBGiKIoQzyMa2Xe2+/0s72Rqi6Oqg6zpjwPuRpMRNNxJwx2eKRL2kXrzaquCspbfY kbJYWG6LH/kE8c66y/8PgsgUK0XDZ9mP4tbTwXy6zrjR1KqMoHxgbg4mrRmkH1/EjaMc+h4 3z1fkUZ8Z5xPqs9IS7Z2w== Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 04.06.2014 22:50, schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Jens Lehmann writes: > >> Am 04.06.2014 00:16, schrieb Junio C Hamano: >>> * jl/status-added-submodule-is-never-ignored (2014-04-07) 2 commits >>> - commit -m: commit staged submodules regardless of ignore config >>> - status/commit: show staged submodules regardless of ignore config >>> >>> There also are a few patches Ronald Weiss and Jens are working on >>> polishing around this topic, and a patch from Jens each for gitk >>> and git-gui. >>> >>> Waiting for the dust to settle until picking them up all. >> >> To me it looks like the dust settled enough around that part of the >> topic and I remember consensus about that change. But it would be >> nice to have the gitk and git-gui patches in at the same time. > > Yes, what I meant was that after the dust settled, it may turn out > that these two may need to be adjusted. If these two commits can be > used without any change as a base for any further development, that > is good---shall I move it back to "Cooking" category? I'm not aware of any necessary adjustments, so I'd appreciate if they'd be moved back into "Cooking".