From: Karsten Blees <karsten.blees@gmail.com>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>,
"Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] abspath.c: use PATH_MAX in real_path_internal()
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 01:55:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53CB0575.5020707@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53C905EB.3010908@web.de>
Am 18.07.2014 13:32, schrieb René Scharfe:
> Am 18.07.2014 01:03, schrieb Karsten Blees:
>> Am 17.07.2014 19:05, schrieb René Scharfe:
>>> Am 17.07.2014 14:45, schrieb Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy:
>> [...]
>>> "These routines have traditionally been used by programs to save the
>>> name of a working directory for the purpose of returning to it. A much
>>> faster and less error-prone method of accomplishing this is to open the
>>> current directory (.) and use the fchdir(2) function to return."
>>>
>>
>> fchdir() is part of the POSIX-XSI extension, as is realpath(). So why not
>> use realpath() directly (which would also be thread-safe)?
>
> That's a good question; thanks for stepping back and looking at the bigger picture. If there is widespread OS support for a functionality then we should use it and just provide a compatibility implementation for those platforms lacking it. The downside is that compat code gets less testing.
>
I just noticed that in contrast to the POSIX realpath(), our real_path() doesn't require the last path component to exist. I don't know if this property is required by the calling code, though.
> Seeing that readlink()
You mean realpath()? We don't have a stub for that yet.
> is left as a stub in compat/mingw.h that only errors out, would the equivalent function on Windows be PathCanonicalize (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb773569%28v=vs.85%29.aspx)?
>
PathCanonicalize() doesn't return an absolute path, the realpath() equivalent would be GetFullPathName() (doesn't resolve symlinks) or GetFinalPathNameByHandle() (requires Vista, resolves symlinks, requires the path to exist).
>> For non-XSI-compliant platforms, we could keep the current implementation.
>
> OK, so realpath() for Linux and the BSDs, mingw_realpath() wrapping PathCanonicalize() for Windows and the current code for the rest?
>
>> Or re-implement a thread-safe version, e.g. applying resolve_symlink() from
>> lockfile.c to all path components.
>
> Thread safety sounds good. We'd also need something like normalize_path_copy() but without the conversion of backslashes to slashes, in order to get rid of "." and ".." path components and something like absolute_path() that doesn't die on error, no?
>
Windows can handle forward slashes, so normalize_path_copy works just fine.
>> If I may bother you with the Windows point of view:
>>
>> There is no fchdir(), and I'm pretty sure open(".") won't work either.
>
> On Windows, there *is* an absolute path length limit of 260 in the normal case and a bit more than 32000 for some functions using the \\?\ namespace. So one could get away with using a constant-sized buffer for a "remember the place and return later" function here.
>
The current directory is pretty much the only exception to the \\?\ trick [1]. So a fixed buffer for getcwd() would actually be fine on Windows (although it would have to be 3 * PATH_MAX, as PATH_MAX wide chars will convert to at most 3 * PATH_MAX UTF-8 chars).
However, a POSIX conformant getcwd must fail with ERANGE if the buffer is too small. So a better alternative would be to add a strbuf_getcwd() that works similar to strbuf_readlink() (i.e. resize the buffer until its large enough).
Side note: the 'hard' 260 limit for the current directory also means that as long as we *simulate* realpath() via chdir()/getcwd(), long paths [1] don't work here.
> Also, _getcwd can be asked to allocate an appropriately-sized buffer for use, like GNU's get_current_dir_name, by specifying NULL as its first parameter (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/sf98bd4y.aspx).
>
We use nedmalloc in the Windows builds, so unfortuately we cannot free memory allocated by MSVCRT.dll.
[1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365530%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
[2] https://github.com/msysgit/git/commit/84393750
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-19 23:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-17 12:45 [PATCH] abspath.c: use PATH_MAX in real_path_internal() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2014-07-17 17:05 ` René Scharfe
2014-07-17 18:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-17 23:03 ` Karsten Blees
2014-07-18 10:49 ` Duy Nguyen
2014-07-18 15:08 ` René Scharfe
2014-07-19 12:51 ` Duy Nguyen
2014-07-20 0:29 ` Karsten Blees
2014-07-20 8:00 ` René Scharfe
2014-07-21 2:25 ` Jeff King
2014-07-18 11:32 ` René Scharfe
2014-07-19 23:55 ` Karsten Blees [this message]
2014-07-20 11:17 ` René Scharfe
2014-07-17 18:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-07-17 23:02 ` Karsten Blees
2014-07-17 23:03 ` Karsten Blees
2014-07-18 16:45 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53CB0575.5020707@gmail.com \
--to=karsten.blees@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).