From: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
To: Nikolay Avdeev <avdeev@math.vsu.ru>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Bug report about symlinks
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:04:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53DABD69.7010004@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <web-416867478@relay1.vsu.ru>
Am 31.07.2014 um 21:50 schrieb Nikolay Avdeev:
> I've noticed something strange with git status when replacing a folder with
> symlink to another folder.
> There is a git repo with script with demo in the attachment.
Let's try and make this a bit easier for folks to follow along.
# Create test repo with two directories with two files each.
$ git init
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/.git/
$ mkdir a b
$ echo x >a/equal
$ echo x >b/equal
$ echo y >a/different
$ echo z >b/different
$ git add a b
$ git commit -minitial
[master (root-commit) 6d36895] initial
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 a/different
create mode 100644 a/equal
create mode 100644 b/different
create mode 100644 b/equal
# Replace one directory with a symlink to the other.
$ rm -rf b
$ ln -s a b
# First git status call.
$ git status
On branch master
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add/rm <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git checkout -- <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
deleted: b/different
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
b
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
# Stage the changes.
$ git add b
# Second git status call.
$ git status
On branch master
Changes to be committed:
(use "git reset HEAD <file>..." to unstage)
new file: b
deleted: b/different
deleted: b/equal
# Commit the staged changes.
$ git commit -msymlinked
[master 4498f28] symlinked
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 120000 b
delete mode 100644 b/different
delete mode 100644 b/equal
That the first and second status call report different results is a
feature; staging changes using git add alters the status. A commit
after the first status call would be empty.
It could be debated if the first git status call should also report
b/equal as deleted.
René
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-31 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-31 19:50 Bug report about symlinks Nikolay Avdeev
2014-07-31 22:04 ` René Scharfe [this message]
2014-08-01 16:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-02 14:10 ` René Scharfe
2014-08-03 17:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-03 22:59 ` René Scharfe
2014-08-04 16:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2014-08-09 17:43 ` [PATCH] read-cache: check for leading symlinks when refreshing index René Scharfe
2014-08-04 11:03 ` Bug report about symlinks Duy Nguyen
2014-08-04 16:36 ` Junio C Hamano
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-07-30 11:30 NickKolok
2014-08-01 19:10 ` Dennis Kaarsemaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53DABD69.7010004@web.de \
--to=l.s.r@web.de \
--cc=avdeev@math.vsu.ru \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).