Re: [RFH] renaming strcmp/strncmp-icase

["Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>]

On 2014-09-08 20.52, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> There are these two functions in dir.c that has only a handful of
> callers outside:
> 
>     int strcmp_icase(const char *a, const char *b);
>     int strncmp_icase(const char *a, const char *b, size_t count);
> 
> How many of you would think these are about comparing two strings in
> a case-insensitive way?
> 
> If you raised your hand (like I did), you were wrong.  These do
> comparison case-insensitively only on a case-insensitive filesystem,
> and hence calling it makes sense only for pathnames you grabbed out
> of the filesystem via readdir() (or the user gave us, intending to
> name paths).
> 
> To avoid confusion, I think they should be renamed to stress the
> fact that these are about comparing *PATHS*.  As I always say, I am
> bad at naming things and good suggestions are appreciated.
> 
> FYI, there are names I thought about and haven't managed to convince
> myself that they are good.
> 
> A good name for the non-n variant may be "compare_paths()", but that
> is used in "combine-diff.c".  "compare_pathnames()" may be a
> compromise.
> 
> However, either of these makes it hard to come up with a
> corresponding name for the "n" (counted) variant.  The best I could
> do was "compare_pathnames_counted()", but a nice similarity to
> strcmp()/strncmp() pair is lost.
> 
> pathnamecmp()/pathnamencmp() perhaps?
> 
> I dunno.
And then we have this in name-hash.c:
(Which may explain the "icase" suffix ?)

static int same_name(const struct cache_entry *ce, const char *name, int namelen, int icase)
{
	int len = ce_namelen(ce);

	/*
	 * Always do exact compare, even if we want a case-ignoring comparison;
	 * we do the quick exact one first, because it will be the common case.
	 */
	if (len == namelen && !memcmp(name, ce->name, len))
		return 1;

	if (!icase)
		return 0;

	return slow_same_name(name, namelen, ce->name, len);
}

-----------
static int slow_same_name(const char *name1, int len1, const char *name2, int len2)
{
	if (len1 != len2)
		return 0;

	while (len1) {
		unsigned char c1 = *name1++;
		unsigned char c2 = *name2++;
		len1--;
		if (c1 != c2) {
			c1 = toupper(c1);
			c2 = toupper(c2);
			if (c1 != c2)
				return 0;
		}
	}
	return 1;
}