From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wincent Colaiuta Subject: Re: Question about "git commit -a" Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 17:58:47 +0200 Message-ID: <545CB3B2-96B3-4853-9397-B42F4F268A15@wincent.com> References: <4d8e3fd30710040838t48bb590erbd90a8c4a1c6e932@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "Git Mailing List" To: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 04 18:02:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IdT98-0003Jk-Ed for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:01:54 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760297AbXJDP66 convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:58:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760285AbXJDP65 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:58:57 -0400 Received: from wincent.com ([72.3.236.74]:51213 "EHLO s69819.wincent.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760284AbXJDP64 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 11:58:56 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.129] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by s69819.wincent.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l94Fwr6t020120; Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:58:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4d8e3fd30710040838t48bb590erbd90a8c4a1c6e932@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: El 4/10/2007, a las 17:38, Paolo Ciarrocchi escribi=F3: > Hi all, > I was just wondering why git commit doesn't default to "-a" (yes, it'= s > another question that came up during a chat with a mercurial user) an= d > I didn't find an answer to that. > > It's not a big deal but I strongly suspect that the large majority of > the git users never user git commit without the option "-a". Specifically: > Am I wrong? About it being a majority, yes, I suspect so. Cheers, Wincent