From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Torsten_B=F6gershausen?= Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] add: ignore only ignored files Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:22:23 +0100 Message-ID: <5473937F.6000101@web.de> References: <546F5CC7.8060904@drmicha.warpmail.net> <20141121180105.GB26650@peff.net> <5470A4C0.3070501@web.de> <20141122191932.GA13340@peff.net> <20141123194624.GB16605@peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?windows-1252?Q?Torsten_B=F6gershausen?= , Michael J Gruber , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano , Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 24 21:22:50 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xt09p-0007nb-RC for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:22:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754862AbaKXUWj (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:22:39 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:63810 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753111AbaKXUWi (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Nov 2014 15:22:38 -0500 Received: from macce.local ([78.72.74.102]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M8hxz-1Y5HoO27W7-00wDL5; Mon, 24 Nov 2014 21:22:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:TpsnaCkE4FrqD/uXAJGy1AJeiTNrG+5VEcqKLXJv6L/DWiI1yea o2gBUnCQGI/HL5+CKLSDFPtbWEpzLKID0iH7gawOoV2xdE9fkxI4vT+Ko+ed+oO9TUF9HMv kY0MqGwVQtXeq2+5B++NFqRdUpWgc2j4g3MJrUXDJOYaGcm9zNFZWMlUcmNiQXqD0tcXvez N6FIn3l6wlNaoq5ugXikQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 2014-11-24 18.41, Junio C Hamano wrote: ... >>> Do we refer to t/README from CodingGuidelines where we tell the >>> developers to always write tests to prevent other people from >>> breaking tomorrow what you did today? If not, perhaps that is what >>> needs to be added. >> >> That might make sense. It might also be that Torsten simply overlooked >> it when asking his question (i.e., there is nothing to fix, >> documentation is not always read completely, and we can move on). Thanks, until yesterday I was unaware of t/README, but now I am :-) ....