From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] pkt-line: allow writing of LARGE_PACKET_MAX buffers Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:58:26 +0100 Message-ID: <54875462.3040305@kdbg.org> References: <20141209174958.GA26167@peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 09 20:58:38 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XyQvb-0001ty-1H for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 20:58:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752467AbaLIT6b (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:58:31 -0500 Received: from bsmtp.bon.at ([213.33.87.14]:22664 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751587AbaLIT6a (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2014 14:58:30 -0500 Received: from dx.sixt.local (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3jxsdb5cMcz5tlQ; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 20:58:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from dx.sixt.local (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.sixt.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3E719F828; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 20:58:26 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 In-Reply-To: <20141209174958.GA26167@peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 09.12.2014 um 18:49 schrieb Jeff King: > +test_expect_success 'create repo with absurdly long refname' ' > + ref240=$_z40/$_z40/$_z40/$_z40/$_z40/$_z40 > + ref1440=$ref240/$ref240/$ref240/$ref240/$ref240/$ref240 && > + git init long && > + ( > + cd long && > + test_commit long && > + test_commit master && > + git update-ref refs/heads/$ref1440 long Having this ref on the filesystem is going to fail on Windows, I presume (our limit is 260). Can we stuff it away as a packed ref right from the beginning? (And turn off reflogs, BTW.) > + ) > +' -- Hannes