From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael J Gruber Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] skip RFC1991 tests with gnupg 2.1.x Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:00:41 +0100 Message-ID: <548B1129.80202@drmicha.warpmail.net> References: <1418290234-21516-1-git-send-email-mail@eworm.de> <5489B90B.6070706@web.de> <5489CC60.7080704@drmicha.warpmail.net> <20141211234405.3513d5d7@leda.localdomain> <20141212093543.5175e7a5@leda.localdomain> <20141212105444.50adca35@leda.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: =?windows-1252?Q?Torsten_B=F6gershausen?= , git@vger.kernel.org To: Christian Hesse , Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 12 17:00:51 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XzSe9-0003yb-1g for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 17:00:49 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933677AbaLLQAp (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:00:45 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:47496 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757971AbaLLQAo (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:00:44 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883F4209F7 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:00:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:00:43 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=x-sasl-enc:message-id:date:from :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=r6n/Bo6AVl6dvR5s9s63hW lUjMk=; b=j+mZElHCqBpxBZi1aykjN/d6295Ma2MlLF0YhHFXiesKxY7rZaDpLW /OiC035PqR3RWJK+S9UTukc0q++WhJLcwSfadDrwBzmdMqZN5tKTf67vecm4Iq6q MFATDGpgdcPaZlsbIDO4Yj5AlakPz9zg1a92yKw8Avdl06VxWeGh0= X-Sasl-enc: MR8NMXfzCKjBPWhF1mumqtcGv2EvULjLGK+cK1OfgN3r 1418400043 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [130.75.46.56]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B2C16C00285; Fri, 12 Dec 2014 11:00:42 -0500 (EST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 In-Reply-To: <20141212105444.50adca35@leda.localdomain> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Christian Hesse schrieb am 12.12.2014 um 10:54: > Christian Hesse on Fri, 2014/12/12 09:35: >> Junio C Hamano on Thu, 2014/12/11 15:10: >>> Christian Hesse writes: >>> >>>> However... Even if GnuPG 2.2.x (or whatever future release) will become >>>> next stable: It will not reintroduce support for rfc1991. >>> >>> How certain are we about the deprecation? >> >> The sixth beta of GnuPG [0] had this change: >> >> * gpg: Removed the option --pgp2 and --rfc1991 and the ability to >> create PGP-2 compatible messages. > > This is the corresponding commit: > > http://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=gnupg.git;a=commit;h=2b8d8369d59249b89526c18c5ac276e6445dc35e > So, in fact, gpg2.1 removes support for creating pgp2 (rfc1991) signatures only. That is: We could put an armor exported signature into our test suite, test verification against that signature, and restrict the test for creation of that signature by gpg version (or skip it completely). Michael