From: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] t1050-large: replace dd by test-genrandom
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:33:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B59D24.7030508@kdbg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150113214733.GA16582@peff.net>
Am 13.01.2015 um 22:47 schrieb Jeff King:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 06:36:27PM +0100, Johannes Sixt wrote:
>
>> For some unknown reason, the dd on my Windows box segfaults every now
>> and than, but since recently, it does so much more often than it used
>> to, which makes running the test suite burdensome.
>>
>> Get rid of four invocations of dd and use test-genrandom instead.
>
> There are a dozen other uses of dd in the test suite. Do they all need
> to go?
Yes, at best.
>> The new code does change some properties of the generated files:
>>
>> - They are a bit smaller.
>> - They are not sparse anymore.
>> - They do not compress well anymore.
>
> This is unfortunate, as it means other platforms will be slower. I
> measured a best-of-five on running t1050 going from 0.780s to 1.750s.
> That's on an SSD. Doing it on a RAM disk the numbers are 0.600s and
> 1.394s. Better, but not great.
Certainly you run the test suite a *LOT* more often than I do, so
theoretically, your (and everybody else's) lost time does add up to
more than the 5 minutes that I need to take care of the failing test
scripts until each test case happens to succeed at least once. So...
BTW, is it the incompressibility where the time is lost or lack of
sparseness of the files? How does the timing change with this patch on
top?
diff --git a/t/t1050-large.sh b/t/t1050-large.sh
index f653121..9cf4e0e 100755
--- a/t/t1050-large.sh
+++ b/t/t1050-large.sh
@@ -9,10 +9,10 @@ test_expect_success setup '
# clone does not allow us to pass core.bigfilethreshold to
# new repos, so set core.bigfilethreshold globally
git config --global core.bigfilethreshold 200k &&
- test-genrandom seed1 2000000 >large1 &&
+ printf "\0%2000000s" X >large1 &&
cp large1 large2 &&
cp large1 large3 &&
- test-genrandom seed2 2500000 >huge &&
+ printf "\0%2500000s" Y >huge &&
GIT_ALLOC_LIMIT=1500k &&
export GIT_ALLOC_LIMIT
'
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-13 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-13 17:36 [PATCH] t1050-large: replace dd by test-genrandom Johannes Sixt
2015-01-13 18:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-01-13 19:55 ` Johannes Sixt
2015-01-13 21:47 ` Jeff King
2015-01-13 22:33 ` Johannes Sixt [this message]
2015-01-13 22:38 ` Jeff King
2015-01-13 23:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-01-14 11:27 ` Jeff King
2015-01-14 17:31 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-01-14 20:28 ` [PATCH v2] t1050-large: generate large files without dd Johannes Sixt
2015-01-14 21:00 ` Jeff King
2015-01-14 21:17 ` Johannes Sixt
2015-01-14 21:59 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B59D24.7030508@kdbg.org \
--to=j6t@kdbg.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).