From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Lehmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] nd/multiple-work-trees updates Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:51:07 +1300 Message-ID: <54DD3C6B.7050408@web.de> References: <1420278087-14613-1-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: =?UTF-8?B?Tmd1eeG7hW4gVGjDoWkgTmfhu41jIER1eQ==?= , Mark Levedahl , Max Kirillov To: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 13 00:51:24 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YM3XX-0006DK-9Z for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:51:23 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750992AbbBLXvS convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:51:18 -0500 Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.11]:61966 "EHLO mout.web.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750810AbbBLXvS (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:51:18 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.64] ([122.61.97.93]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MNtTz-1YFi0p3bZb-007Xt2; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:51:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:x3uLXKHSehFHWopm7BbXL4FE1xWGCQo1dS0awIyG82WclY96TkK svKUAslyJzWDrniKnOygaxpQyaoKS0/BmBt1CvNtV+mTQrZrDDtUIO2ULDOGNvgY/AsBkZ3 002TF2jrdYGXwLCkxR7wCI7dtyN3CPNjjuTsEv/RO1Qv53U/Ta8B8XjsMY37MiNmqFzQHWr Nc4thC2f73OCSSFUF/Uyw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 13.02.2015 um 11:57 schrieb Junio C Hamano: > Nguy=E1=BB=85n Th=C3=A1i Ng=E1=BB=8Dc Duy writes= : > >> These patches are on top of what's in 'pu'. They add >> --ignore-other-worktrees and make a note about current submodule >> support status. I don't think submodule support is ready yet even >> with Max Kirillov's series [1]. His 03/03 is already fixed in 'pu' >> though, so only 01/03 and 02/03 are new. >> >> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/261107 > > With the understanding (perhaps a strongly-worded paragraph in the > release notes) that this is not suitable for submodule users yet, > is this in a good enough shape to go to 'next'? No objections from my side (and maybe we should also add a warning that *all* worktree-related configuration - e.g. EOL options - are currently always shared between all worktrees). Adding submodule support can then be done in another series (and renaming core.worktree to something else is definitely *not* the way to do that! ;-).