From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Schuberth Subject: Re: Git Scaling: What factors most affect Git performance for a large repo? Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 23:08:55 +0100 Message-ID: <54E7B077.3050501@gmail.com> References: <20150220000320.GD5021@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "brian m. carlson" , Stephen Morton , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 20 23:09:27 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YOvlH-0005GA-7R for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 23:09:27 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754605AbbBTWJR (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:09:17 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:47110 "EHLO mail-wg0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754526AbbBTWJR (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 17:09:17 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id n12so15672555wgh.1 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:09:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:newsgroups:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zJpXRKsp3mthnqITgZd8Uh2/S9Pm/SthPXx/Ktm0z9s=; b=hNPNZkLRi/CPiZuawg+1xNGzJBSaVf7wi2AFzH/ffiYVUSpSMxskmLnc7RomYpvTu1 j3XzhmDNrZiMw7N5Jxm+zYO5GpZ+SpyUNHTMig/OZiW76D691Ht17YzF1/lAVLwNZHPp ZTLb+nVdbGPFYgKcpctZHe9DcLcXyrXmKoGZtmjJemgYN16kE3wBNZpRlQUMSoynm3vJ H1Saylc5Z5phRH1TIIlCib3JpeYbCQ8sBBG9qarsDNWS8G7bTug5cqzwb7pwgD7Rspik gYC0GQcX2KJ5I9nO2p6hw2IYTU8agGEalKEwr5Uo4cYHYqFYkCEtonotKEyPs52C0SAH wA4A== X-Received: by 10.180.97.226 with SMTP id ed2mr1715661wib.4.1424470155653; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:09:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.188.20] (p5B156C57.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.21.108.87]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v7sm43907435wju.22.2015.02.20.14.09.12 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Feb 2015 14:09:14 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.git In-Reply-To: <20150220000320.GD5021@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 20.02.2015 01:03, brian m. carlson wrote: > If you want good performance, I'd recommend the latest version of Git > both client- and server-side. Newer versions of Git provide pack > bitmaps, which can dramatically speed up clones and fetches, and Git Do you happen now which version, if at all, of JGit and Gerrit support pack bitmaps? > 2.3.0 fixes a performance regression with large numbers of refs in > non-shallow repositories. Do you also know in what Git version the regression was introduced? -- Sebastian Schuberth