From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marc Branchaud Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Tweaking the gitk window title. Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:39:47 -0500 Message-ID: <54F48443.2020007@xiplink.com> References: <1420566720-25238-1-git-send-email-marcnarc@xiplink.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paul Mackerras To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 02 16:38:35 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YSSQU-0006ms-Mk for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 16:38:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753773AbbCBPia (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2015 10:38:30 -0500 Received: from smtp82.ord1c.emailsrvr.com ([108.166.43.82]:48230 "EHLO smtp82.ord1c.emailsrvr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753635AbbCBPi3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2015 10:38:29 -0500 Received: from smtp3.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1CFCD18075A; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 10:38:29 -0500 (EST) Received: by smtp3.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: mbranchaud-AT-xiplink.com) with ESMTPSA id CE3D51804C5; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 10:38:28 -0500 (EST) X-Sender-Id: mbranchaud@xiplink.com Received: from [10.10.1.32] ([UNAVAILABLE]. [192.252.130.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA) by 0.0.0.0:465 (trex/5.4.2); Mon, 02 Mar 2015 15:38:29 GMT User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 In-Reply-To: <1420566720-25238-1-git-send-email-marcnarc@xiplink.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 15-01-06 12:51 PM, Marc Branchaud wrote: > The first patch simply changes the title from "gitk: " to " - gitk", > which is the title layout used by most of the applications on my Kubuntu box. > > The second patch is the one that I'm more keen to see accepted. It relies > on the first only in that it follows the new title layout. Ping? M.