From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] t5312: test object deletion code paths in a corrupted repository Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:42:33 +0100 Message-ID: <5509E339.2030900@kdbg.org> References: <20150317072750.GA22155@peff.net> <20150317072844.GA25191@peff.net> <5508739A.5030608@kdbg.org> <20150317185550.GA14550@peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Michael Haggerty To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 18 21:42:44 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YYKna-0002xv-PH for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:42:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755192AbbCRUmi (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:42:38 -0400 Received: from bsmtp4.bon.at ([195.3.86.186]:62792 "EHLO bsmtp.bon.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755197AbbCRUmh (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:42:37 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 94112 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 16:42:37 EDT Received: from dx.site (unknown [93.83.142.38]) by bsmtp.bon.at (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3l6jwp1bgJz5tlC; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:42:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by dx.site (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5726D51FC; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 21:42:33 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 In-Reply-To: <20150317185550.GA14550@peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Am 17.03.2015 um 19:55 schrieb Jeff King: > + echo $bogus >.git/refs/heads/bogus..name && >... > I assumed the final "." in your example wasn't significant (it is not to > git), but let me know if I've run afoul of another weird restriction. :) It was actually deliberate (with intents too complicated to explain), but it turns out not to be required. Your updated test case is good. -- Hannes