From: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
Sam Bishop <Sam.Bishop@blackboard.com>,
"git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git=p4.py rebase now honor's client spec
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 08:13:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <550BD6C2.4070208@diamand.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150319215816.GI612775@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net>
On 19/03/15 21:58, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 12:28:09PM +0000, Sam Bishop wrote:
>> When using the git-p4.py script, I found that if I used a client spec when
>> cloning out a perforce repository, and then using a git-p4.py rebase, that
>> the rebase command would be using the current perforce client spec,
>> instead of the one used when doing the initial clone. My proposed patch
>> causes the rebase command to switch to the perforce client spec used when
>> doing the initial git-p4.py clone.
>>
That's very useful, thanks. I've noticed that behaviour in the past and
always thought it ought to be fixed. As Brian notes, it needs a
"Signed-off" line in the patch.
A very small nit: could you prefix the subject with "git p4:" so that
it's consistent with other recent git-p4 changes - it makes it easier to
pick them out when reviewing changes.
Could you run the git-p4 unit tests on it please (t/t98*)? I could be
wrong about this, but it looks to me like t9806-git-p4-options.sh
doesn't pass now with this change (*)
Thanks!
Luke
(*) There's at least one test that doesn't pass anyway, but this seems
to be new.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-20 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-19 12:28 [PATCH] git=p4.py rebase now honor's client spec Sam Bishop
2015-03-19 21:58 ` brian m. carlson
2015-03-20 8:13 ` Luke Diamand [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=550BD6C2.4070208@diamand.org \
--to=luke@diamand.org \
--cc=Sam.Bishop@blackboard.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).