From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Noel Grandin Subject: possible minor bug: 'git apply --reject' unnecessarily touches files Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:01:16 +0200 Message-ID: <550C282C.6090302@peralex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 20 15:01:30 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YYxUP-0003ec-Cl for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 15:01:29 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752205AbbCTOBU (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:01:20 -0400 Received: from mail.peralex.com ([41.164.8.44]:15601 "EHLO mail.peralex.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751899AbbCTOBS (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Mar 2015 10:01:18 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.95] (noel1.ct [192.168.1.95]) by mail.peralex.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 34243336F51 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:01:14 +0200 (SAST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=peralex.com; s=default; t=1426860074; bh=Pt9kzCSOVHVjixBOsrdDIGqFqNdNjWmC4UFDCFKDn4c=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=crI7KLEilbJs7bUtxaihN04viz6sV38E2wY14HgS4vqz8wZd1Mwm+gBBrIrQHzMEk 9w3zHyPA5MEFwcq5IpBb6xKbdf+JL/oUEFySEF+itT/0tH3pcg44s8fJsSH9SCoRF9 uyeyx7oKHENVy0ngEkhqo4XlZvO5EVvTTMcel1D4= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.peralex.com); Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:01:14 +0200 (SAST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 on 41.164.8.44 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi I'm doing some splitting of a large patch and I noticed that when I do $ git apply --reject large_patch.diff and it generates a lot of .rej files, it seems to be touching the files that produced the .rej output, even if nothing in that particular file was actually updated. Not a major issue, but it would help my build times, which are considerable when working on LibreOffice :-) Thanks, Noel Grandin Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html