From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Tom Clarke" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Adding rebase merge strategy Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:11:14 +0200 Message-ID: <550f9510710030711p195378c5t2739292d31a12de@mail.gmail.com> References: <11912513203420-git-send-email-tom@u2i.com> <7vr6ker1lf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <550f9510710011441t1eb50352ofc8db77f79d794d5@mail.gmail.com> <87ejgescnb.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <550f9510710011521s126ca747v956a6f80182444bb@mail.gmail.com> <20071001223050.GE2137@spearce.org> <550f9510710020329m7917dc9m2bb6cfc4055fea84@mail.gmail.com> <7vr6kdl5rj.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Johannes Schindelin" , "Shawn O. Pearce" , "Carl Worth" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Junio C Hamano" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Oct 03 16:11:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Id4wh-0001zd-9C for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2007 16:11:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754156AbXJCOLS (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:11:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753936AbXJCOLS (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:11:18 -0400 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.182]:59465 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751922AbXJCOLR (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Oct 2007 10:11:17 -0400 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so8505328pyb for ; Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.63.2 with SMTP id q2mr11211655pyk.1191420674369; Wed, 03 Oct 2007 07:11:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.86.2 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Oct 2007 07:11:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7vr6kdl5rj.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 10/2/07, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I do not offhand think of a place other than "git pull" that > would make sense to sometimes be able to rebase when you > normally use merge, so I am inclined to say it would be easier > to teach that "'git pull' is usually a 'git fetch' followed by > 'git merge', but in certain workflow it is handier to 'git > fetch' and then 'git rebase', and here are the ways to get the > rebasing behaviour...". I agree. I'll revisit teaching pull to be able to use rebase. Thanks, -Tom