From: karthik nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, sunshine@sunshineco.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/4] cat-file: teach cat-file a '--literally' option
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:56:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <552F6429.9050304@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqiocxjeqn.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
On 04/16/2015 02:22 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes:
>> ...
>>> - if (argc != 3 && argc != 2)
>>> + if (argc < 2 || argc > 4)
>>> usage_with_options(cat_file_usage, options);
>>
>> Hmm, why this change?
>>
>> By allowing 4 args blindly like this, you will let something like
>> these to pass:
>>
>> $ git cat-file --textconv -t HEAD
>> commit
>> $ git cat-file -p -t HEAD
>> commit
>> $ git cat-file -s -t HEAD
>> commit
>> $ git cat-file -t -s HEAD
>> 879
>>
>> It is fine if you are declaring that the last one wins when these
>> mutually-exclusive options are given. "git cat-file -e -s -t HEAD"
>> should also say "commit" if that is what you are doing, but instead
>> the code with this patch complains, which is bad.
>>
>> It also is fine and is more in line with the spirit of the original
>> code if you keep the rule tight and only one of these mutually
>> exclusive options is allowed.
>>
>> In either case, this check needs to be rethought.
>
> I wonder if we want to do something like this as a preliminary step
> before your [PATCH 2/4]. Everything after the parse_options() call
> seems to protect against leftover argc depending on what they need
> already, so the only thing existing "we take only 2 or 3 args" check
> is doing is to protect against giving more than one command mode
> options, I think. And OPT_CMDMODE() should do a much better job at
> that that kind of thing, by giving a more informative error message
> e.g.
>
> $ git cat-file -p -e HEAD
> error: switch 'e': incompatible with -p
>
> This is a tangent, but while we are in the vicinity, we may want to
> rethink the help message we attach to the '-e' option. Technically
> the current message is _not_ wrong per-se, but it misses the point.
> The primary thing the option does is to check the (e)xistence of the
> named object, and the fact that it does so silently is merely a
> detail of the operation. The current help text omits the more
> important part of what the option is.
Would you rather check '-e' and go on to check '-p' or do you merely
just want a different message.
As far as I see whenever any option other than a '-e' is given it
indirectly has to check for the existence of the object.
eg:
$ git cat-file -t asdfghjkl
fatal: Not a valid object name asdfghjkl
$ git cat-file -e asdfghjkl
fatal: Not a valid object name asdfghjkl
So when a user is giving the '-e' option he just expects a silent output
if the object exists, hence we rather have the option '-e' behave as a
mutually exclusive option and output the error message like.
$ git cat-file -p -e HEAD
error: switch 'e': incompatible with -p
what do you think?
>
> builtin/cat-file.c | 13 +++++--------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/builtin/cat-file.c b/builtin/cat-file.c
> index 1ec7190..534991d 100644
> --- a/builtin/cat-file.c
> +++ b/builtin/cat-file.c
> @@ -372,12 +372,12 @@ int cmd_cat_file(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>
> const struct option options[] = {
> OPT_GROUP(N_("<type> can be one of: blob, tree, commit, tag")),
> - OPT_SET_INT('t', NULL, &opt, N_("show object type"), 't'),
> - OPT_SET_INT('s', NULL, &opt, N_("show object size"), 's'),
> - OPT_SET_INT('e', NULL, &opt,
> + OPT_CMDMODE('t', NULL, &opt, N_("show object type"), 't'),
> + OPT_CMDMODE('s', NULL, &opt, N_("show object size"), 's'),
> + OPT_CMDMODE('e', NULL, &opt,
> N_("exit with zero when there's no error"), 'e'),
> - OPT_SET_INT('p', NULL, &opt, N_("pretty-print object's content"), 'p'),
> - OPT_SET_INT(0, "textconv", &opt,
> + OPT_CMDMODE('p', NULL, &opt, N_("pretty-print object's content"), 'p'),
> + OPT_CMDMODE(0, "textconv", &opt,
> N_("for blob objects, run textconv on object's content"), 'c'),
> OPT_BOOL( 0, "literally", &literally,
> N_("allow -s and -t to work with broken/corrupt objects")),
> @@ -392,9 +392,6 @@ int cmd_cat_file(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>
> git_config(git_cat_file_config, NULL);
>
> - if (argc < 2 || argc > 4)
> - usage_with_options(cat_file_usage, options);
> -
> argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, options, cat_file_usage, 0);
>
> if (opt) {
>
Thanks! Didn't know about the OPT_CMDMODE option.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-16 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-15 16:55 [PATCH v8 0/4] cat-file: teach cat-file a '--literally' option karthik nayak
2015-04-15 16:59 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] sha1_file.c: support reading from a loose object of unknown type Karthik Nayak
2015-04-15 20:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-15 22:18 ` Jeff King
2015-04-17 14:23 ` Jeff King
2015-04-17 16:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-17 20:51 ` Jeff King
2015-04-17 21:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-20 18:43 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-20 18:51 ` Jeff King
2015-04-21 11:26 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-21 14:24 ` Jeff King
2015-04-17 18:45 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-17 18:49 ` Jeff King
2015-04-18 8:31 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-17 19:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-18 8:32 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-17 23:31 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-18 9:03 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-15 16:59 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] cat-file: teach cat-file a '--literally' option Karthik Nayak
2015-04-15 20:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-15 20:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-16 7:26 ` karthik nayak [this message]
2015-04-16 13:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-17 2:10 ` Karthik Nayak
2015-04-17 2:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-19 0:28 ` Charles Bailey
2015-04-20 5:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-20 7:44 ` Charles Bailey
2015-04-20 8:57 ` Karthik Nayak
2015-04-20 9:19 ` Charles Bailey
2015-04-20 15:52 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-21 10:16 ` Charles Bailey
2015-04-21 19:40 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-21 20:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-25 11:22 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-25 17:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-04-27 11:57 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-27 18:38 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-28 12:03 ` karthik nayak
2015-04-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] cat-file: add documentation for " Karthik Nayak
2015-04-15 17:00 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] t1006: add tests for git cat-file --literally Karthik Nayak
2015-04-18 0:00 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-04-18 5:22 ` karthik nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=552F6429.9050304@gmail.com \
--to=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).