From: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Multiple push remotes via aliases
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 16:17:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5550BA16.2090304@alum.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150510181703.GC225482@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 05/10/2015 08:17 PM, brian m. carlson wrote:
> I recently discovered that it was possible to specify multiple push
> URLs for a remote. This is useful for me because some of my
> projects live both on GitHub and on my own server, and some live
> only one place or the other.
>
> One feature that I'm looking for, however, is the ability to
> specify those URLs by reference to another remote. For example,
> making the remote def (default) refer to the remotes gh and
> upstream instead of duplicating the URLs. This makes dealing with
> URL changes easier and goes along with the DRY approach.
>
> I don't think we already have this functionality (at least I don't
> see code for it), and I'd like to implement it, but maybe the
> documentation is just missing and I should submit a patch for that
> instead. Do we have such a thing, and if not, do people think this
> is a worthwhile feature?
For fetching, we already have
> remotes.<group> The list of remotes which are fetched by "git
> remote update <group>". See git-remote(1).
ISTM that your feature is akin to this one and could piggyback on the
same configuration. By analogy with "git remote update <group>", the
corresponding command could be
git remote push <group> [...]
You suggested being able to run something like
git push <group> [...]
which is a little bit shorter. If so, then it is natural to ask
whether <group> should be allowed in place of <repo> whenever it makes
sense, as a general UI principle. If so, then
git fetch <group> [...]
could be shorthand for "git remote update <group> [...]".
But please note that I haven't thought about whether the <repo> ->
<group> generalization could be done consistently, vs. whether the
groupwise commands are different enough from the single-repo commands
that the supposed generalization would be more confusing than useful.
Michael
- --
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@alum.mit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iEYEARECAAYFAlVQuhUACgkQwg9mrRwfmAkFbQCghrQhBaerq0W7suJzu0cr7RGW
Cy0AoIkvgbWmOnwJfeldk73vNMPbc197
=arW/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-11 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-10 18:17 Multiple push remotes via aliases brian m. carlson
2015-05-10 18:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-05-10 19:10 ` brian m. carlson
2015-05-11 14:17 ` Michael Haggerty [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5550BA16.2090304@alum.mit.edu \
--to=mhagger@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).