From: Jan Smets <jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: repository corruption when pushing commits to a repository running 'git gc --prune='
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:44:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561E5C5B.3090207@alcatel-lucent.com> (raw)
Hi
I've recently expired my reflog to prune loose objects. On a live, bare,
repository I ran 'git gc --prune=now'
All clients ended up having problems, they would report:
error: refs/heads/master does not point to a valid object!
Running 'git log' on the bare repo gave : fatal: bad object HEAD
So I did a couple of tries reproducing the issue and with this little
test I got a couple of interesting different/similar outcomes
A: mkdir -p /tmp/test; cd /tmp/test ; git init --bare bare ;
B: cd /tmp/test ; git clone bare 1 ; cd 1; touch test; git add test;
while true; do date >> test ; git commit -m "$(date)" test ; git push ||
break; done
A: cd bare; git gc --prune=now (or run it in a loop)
1)
fatal: bad object 22f0351258fa0bb4cd28984b6473510957fbce69
fatal: bad object 22f0351258fa0bb4cd28984b6473510957fbce69
To /tmp/test/bare
! [remote rejected] master -> master (missing necessary objects)
2)
remote: error: unable to write sha1 filename
objects/05/cdb51bb0ea3e229734a4b1bddd5ec70fbc65ed: No such file or directory
remote: fatal: failed to write object
error: unpack failed: unpack-objects abnormal exit
To /tmp/test/bare
! [remote rejected] master -> master (unpacker error)
3)
error: Ref refs/heads/master is at
e992810e70949e797d33041bf6bc961c9fa4f3e5 but expected
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
remote: error: Cannot lock ref 'refs/heads/master':
To /tmp/test/bare
! [remote rejected] master -> master (failed to update ref)
4)
remote: error: cannot lock ref 'refs/heads/master': Unable to create
'/tmp/test/bare/refs/heads/master.lock': File exists.
remote:
remote: If no other git process is currently running, this probably means a
remote: git process crashed in this repository earlier. Make sure no
other git
remote: process is running and remove the file manually to continue.
To /tmp/test/bare
! [remote rejected] master -> master (failed to update ref)
error: failed to push some refs to '/tmp/test/bare'
And eventually running 'git gc --prune=now/all' on the bare repository
could end with this message:
$ git gc --prune=all
error: refs/heads/master does not point to a valid object!
fatal: bad object refs/heads/master
error: failed to run repack
$ git log -1
fatal: bad object HEAD
This behaviour has been observed with version 2.4.4, 2.5.[12] and 2.6.1
Thank you
- Jan
next reply other threads:[~2015-10-14 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-14 13:44 Jan Smets [this message]
2015-10-14 14:38 ` repository corruption when pushing commits to a repository running 'git gc --prune=' Matthieu Moy
2015-10-14 17:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-10-14 18:40 ` Matthieu Moy
2015-10-14 20:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-10-14 21:09 ` Matthieu Moy
2015-10-14 21:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-10-14 18:46 ` Matthieu Moy
2015-10-14 20:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-10-14 20:08 ` Matthieu Moy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561E5C5B.3090207@alcatel-lucent.com \
--to=jan.smets@alcatel-lucent.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).