Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] update-index: use enum for untracked cache options

["Torsten Bögershausen" <tboegi@web.de>]

On 15.12.15 17:28, Christian Couder wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
> ---
>  builtin/update-index.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/builtin/update-index.c b/builtin/update-index.c
> index 7431938..2430a68 100644
> --- a/builtin/update-index.c
> +++ b/builtin/update-index.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,14 @@ static int mark_skip_worktree_only;
>  #define UNMARK_FLAG 2
>  static struct strbuf mtime_dir = STRBUF_INIT;
>  
> +/* Untracked cache mode */
> +enum uc_mode {
> +	UC_UNSPECIFIED = -1,
> +	UC_DISABLE = 0,
> +	UC_ENABLE,
> +	UC_FORCE
> +};
> +
>  __attribute__((format (printf, 1, 2)))
>  static void report(const char *fmt, ...)
>  {
> @@ -902,7 +910,7 @@ static int reupdate_callback(struct parse_opt_ctx_t *ctx,
>  int cmd_update_index(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  {
>  	int newfd, entries, has_errors = 0, line_termination = '\n';
> -	int untracked_cache = -1;
> +	enum uc_mode untracked_cache = UC_UNSPECIFIED;
>  	int read_from_stdin = 0;
>  	int prefix_length = prefix ? strlen(prefix) : 0;
>  	int preferred_index_format = 0;
> @@ -997,7 +1005,7 @@ int cmd_update_index(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  		OPT_BOOL(0, "untracked-cache", &untracked_cache,
>  			N_("enable/disable untracked cache")),
>  		OPT_SET_INT(0, "force-untracked-cache", &untracked_cache,
> -			    N_("enable untracked cache without testing the filesystem"), 2),
> +			    N_("enable untracked cache without testing the filesystem"), UC_FORCE),
>  		OPT_END()
>  	};
>  
> @@ -1104,10 +1112,10 @@ int cmd_update_index(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>  		the_index.split_index = NULL;
>  		the_index.cache_changed |= SOMETHING_CHANGED;
>  	}
> -	if (untracked_cache > 0) {
> +	if (untracked_cache > UC_DISABLE) {
I think the "correct way" for a comparison between an enum and an int is to cast the enum
into an int.
But, if we have an enum, these kind of comparision should go away, and replaced
with a switch-case (or if) statemant.
>  		struct untracked_cache *uc;
>  
> -		if (untracked_cache < 2) {
> +		if (untracked_cache < UC_FORCE) {

Same here