From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Schuberth Subject: Re: Questions on passing --depth to git-clone vs. git-fetch Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 14:04:22 +0100 Message-ID: <568D10D6.7020707@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Git Mailing List To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 06 14:04:57 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aGnli-0000sm-Gc for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:04:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751809AbcAFNEr (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2016 08:04:47 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41004 "EHLO plane.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751601AbcAFNEq (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2016 08:04:46 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aGnlY-0000nJ-Ae for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:04:40 +0100 Received: from 131.228.216.134 ([131.228.216.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:04:40 +0100 Received: from sschuberth by 131.228.216.134 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:04:40 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 131.228.216.134 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On 1/6/2016 13:41, Duy Nguyen wrote: > I think the culprit is the "git remote add" line. "git clone --depth" > by default will fetch only one branch (aka --single-branch option in > git-clone). But I suspect when you add a new remote, the default Now that you mention it I see this being documented as part of --single-branch instead of --depth, which I think is confusing. I'll send a patch. -- Sebastian Schuberth